Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 15;7(1):00705-2020.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00705-2020. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Development and validation of an open-source, disposable, 3D-printed in vitro environmental exposure system for Transwell culture inserts

Affiliations

Development and validation of an open-source, disposable, 3D-printed in vitro environmental exposure system for Transwell culture inserts

Abiram Chandiramohan et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Accessible in vitro models recapitulating the human airway that are amenable to study whole cannabis smoke exposure are needed for immunological and toxicological studies that inform public health policy and recreational cannabis use. In the present study, we developed and validated a novel three-dimensional (3D)-printed in vitro exposure system (IVES) that can be directly applied to study the effect of cannabis smoke exposure on primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Using commercially available design software and a 3D printer, we designed a four-chamber Transwell insert holder for exposures to whole smoke. COMSOL Multiphysics software was used to model gas distribution, concentration gradients, velocity profile and shear stress within IVES. Following simulations, primary human bronchial epithelial cells cultured at the air-liquid interface on Transwell inserts were exposed to whole cannabis smoke using a modified version of the Foltin puff procedure. Following 24 h, outcome measurements included cell morphology, epithelial barrier function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, cytokine expression and gene expression. Whole smoke delivered through IVES possesses velocity profiles consistent with uniform gas distribution across the four chambers and complete mixing. Airflow velocity ranged between 1.0 and 1.5 µm·s-1 and generated low shear stresses (<<1 Pa). Human airway epithelial cells exposed to cannabis smoke using IVES showed changes in cell morphology and disruption of barrier function without significant cytotoxicity. Cannabis smoke elevated interleukin-1 family cytokines and elevated CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 expression relative to control, validating IVES smoke exposure impacts in human airway epithelial cells at a molecular level. The growing legalisation of cannabis on a global scale must be paired with research related to potential health impacts of lung exposures. IVES represents an accessible, open-source, exposure system that can be used to model varying types of cannabis smoke exposures with human airway epithelial cells grown under air-liquid interface culture conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A. Chandiramohan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Dabaghi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.A. Aguiar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Tiessen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Stewart has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Q.T. Cao has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.P. Nguyen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Makhdami has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Cox has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.C. Doxey has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.A. Hirota has nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Three-dimensional schematic view of the in vitro exposure system. As shown, air or exposure (e.g. smoke) delivered to the inlet is equally distributed across the four exposure chambers which house the Transwell inserts. Circulated air or exposure (e.g. smoke) exits passively through the outlet in each exposure chamber. Scale bar=1 cm.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A schematic depicting the in vitro exposure system (IVES) connected to air and smoke sources. A three-way valve connects the cannabis cigarette to IVES through a 50-mL syringe. Another three-way valve connects room air to IVES. Smoke is drawn through the smoke exposure syringe and expelled with predetermined rate and volume into IVES. Room air is introduced with the fresh air syringe in a similar fashion. A heating pad positioned below IVES maintains the experimental system at 37°C (figure generated with BioRender).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Quantitative simulation for in vitro exposure system (IVES) using COMSOL Multiphysics with air used as the gas of interest for simulation. a) A three-dimensional view of the IVES with air flow streamlines showing vortices in IVES and how gases distribute. b) Top view with gas flow streamlines. c and d) The side views with gas flow streamlines. e) The top view of the velocity profile (m·s−1) for the modelled gas presenting a uniform flow distribution among all four exposure chambers with a gentle velocity decrease. f) The velocity profile (μm·s−1) at the close approximation to the surface where the cells were cultured. g) The shear stress (Pa) profile at the location that the cells were cultured. It should be noted that both air and smoke inlets are merged into a larger duct which is only shown in this figure.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Three-dimensional quantitative modelling results of the gas (CO2) concentration distribution in an in vitro exposure system chamber: a) real-time CO2 concentration distribution over 5 s exposure of smoke (initial CO2 concentration modelled at 1.0 mol·L−1) showing a gentle gas distribution in the exposure chamber; b) real-time CO2 concentration distribution over 5 s exposure of fresh air (the initial CO2 concentration was the final CO2 concentration in the exposure chamber from the previous smoke exposure and it was assumed that there was no CO2 in the fresh air exposed to the chamber); c) volume average concentration of CO2 in the chamber for one smoke–fresh air cycle would lead to a drop in CO2 concentration in the chamber back to zero; and d) average outlet concentration of CO2 after one smoke–fresh air cycle confirming that exposure kinetics were sufficient to reach a repeatable smoke–air exposure cycle (zero concentration at the outlet).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
a) Change in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) from baseline after room air versus whole cannabis smoke exposure. Analysed with paired t-test, p=0.029, n=10. b) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) expression as a proportion of maximal LDH release, analysed via ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Shows representative microscopy (×40) of c) Transwell inserts with human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) prior to room air exposure, d) Transwell with HBECs after room air exposure, e) Transwell with HBECs prior to whole cannabis smoke exposure, and f) Transwell with HBECs after whole cannabis smoke exposure (product weight of 0.7 g). Representative microscopy (×100) of g) Transwell inserts with HBECs prior to room air exposure, h) Transwell with HBECs after room air exposure, i) Transwell with HBECs prior to whole cannabis smoke exposure, and j) Transwell with HBECs after whole cannabis smoke exposure (product weight of 0.7 g). *: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Interleukin (IL)-1 cytokine family member quantification in apical washing of primary human airway epithelial cells exposed to air or whole cannabis smoke. a) IL-1α, p=0.054; b) IL-1β, p=0.296; c) IL-18, p=0.064; and d) IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra), p<0.05 (analysed via paired t-tests). *: p<0.05.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Antiviral cytokine quantification in apical washing of primary human airway epithelial cells exposed to air or whole cannabis smoke. a) CXCL10, p=0.110; and b) CCL5, p=0.252 (n=5, analysed via paired t-tests).
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Selected oxidative stress genes expressed in primary human airway epithelial cells exposed to air or whole cannabis smoke. a) CYP1A1, p<0.001; b) CYP1B1, p<0.05; and c) TXNIP, p=0.058 (n=5, analysed via paired t-tests). *: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huff R, Carlsten C, Hirota J. An update on immunologic mechanisms in the respiratory mucosa in response to air pollutants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 143: 1989–2001. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirota JA, Knight DA. Human airway epithelial cell innate immunity: relevance to asthma. Curr Opin Immunol 2012; 24: 740–746. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2012.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwasaki A, Foxman EF, Molony RD. Early local immune defences in the respiratory tract. Nat Rev Immunol 2017; 17: 7–20. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whitsett JA, Alenghat T. Respiratory epithelial cells orchestrate pulmonary innate immunity. Nat Immunol 2015; 16: 27–35. doi:10.1038/ni.3045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganesan S, Comstock AT, Sajjan US. Barrier function of airway tract epithelium. Tissue Barriers 2013; 1: e24997. doi:10.4161/tisb.24997 - DOI - PMC - PubMed