Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 30;3(1):e211-e217.
doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.013. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Removal of Proximal Humerus Locking Plates With Capsular Release Significantly Improves Range of Motion and Function

Affiliations

Arthroscopic-Assisted Removal of Proximal Humerus Locking Plates With Capsular Release Significantly Improves Range of Motion and Function

Justin M Chan et al. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the clinical outcomes following the arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates for symptomatic hardware after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures.

Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic removal of hardware (ROH) with capsular release due to pain and/or immobility after receiving locking plates to treat proximal humerus fractures from 2009 to 2016 were identified. Operative and clinic records were reviewed to obtain demographic information, concomitant procedures during ROH, and pre- and postoperative active shoulder range of motion. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes included the QuickDASH, PROMIS Pain Intensity, Constant, and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale.

Results: In total, 88 patients were included. Patients were evaluated at a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively after ROH. Patients with pre- and postoperative active range of motion values demonstrated significant improvements in mean forward elevation (n = 69; 78.4%; 115.1° to 152.1°, P < .001), abduction (n = 29; 33.0%; 70.9° to 138.7°, P < .001), external rotation (n = 49; 55.7%; 43.7° to 58.6°, P = .012), and internal rotation (n = 45; 51.1%; 25.7° to 61.9°, P < .001). Patients also reported positive patient-reported scores, including the QuickDASH (4.1 ± 7.8), PROMIS Pain Intensity (3.5 ± 0.9), Constant (84.6 ± 10.7), and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (33 ± 2.9), which were measured 70.6 ± 26.6 months postoperatively. There were no surgical complications, no arthroscopic cases were converted to open, but 2 reported refractures (2.3%).

Conclusions: Arthroscopic-assisted removal of proximal humerus locking plates significantly improves motion and function while allowing for management of concomitant shoulder pathology and potentially avoiding open surgery complications. Given that patients undergoing this procedure frequently have multiple comorbidities, arthroscopic-assisted removal with smaller incisions may minimize risks while restoring shoulder mobility. Therefore, arthroscopic ROH for patients experiencing symptomatic hardware after ORIF is recommended.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Radiograph of the right proximal humerus after initial open reduction internal fixation with a precontoured locking plate.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Radiograph of the right proximal humerus status post-removal of precontoured locking plate 64 months after initial open reduction internal fixation surgery with a fibular strut.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Arthroscopic photo from posterior portal with 70° scope showing intra-articular debridement of scar tissue between the undersurface of the deltoid and plate during arthroscopic-assisted removal of proximal humerus plate.

References

    1. Spross C., Platz A., Erschbamer M., Lattmann T., Dietrich M. Surgical treatment of neer group vi proximal humeral fractures: Retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:2035–2042. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khmelnitskaya E., Lamont L.E., Taylor S.A., Lorich D.G., Dines D.M., Dines J.S. Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chudik S.C., Weinhold P., Dahners L.E. Fixed-angle plate fixation in simulated fractures of the proximal humerus: A biomechanical study of a new device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:578–588. - PubMed
    1. Berkes M.B., Little M.T.M., Pardee N.C., Schottel P.C., Lazaro L.E., Lorich D.G. Outcomes of proximal humerus fracture open reduction internal fixation with concomitant ipsilateral shoulder girdle injuries: A case control study. HSS J. 2016;12:105–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunner F., Sommer C., Bahrs C., et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: A prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:163–172. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources