High performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection
- PMID: 33615487
- PMCID: PMC8014580
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26896
High performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has become a major public health issue worldwide. Developing and evaluating rapid and easy-to-perform diagnostic tests is a high priority. The current study was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of an antigen-based rapid detection test (COVID-VIRO®) in a real-life setting. Two nasopharyngeal specimens of symptomatic or asymptomatic adult patients hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases Department or voluntarily accessing the COVID-19 Screening Department of the Regional Hospital of Orléans, France, were concurrently collected. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of COVID VIRO® results were compared to those of real-time reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) results. A subset of patients underwent an additional oropharyngeal and/or saliva swab for rapid testing. A total of 121 patients confirmed to be infected and 127 patients having no evidence of recent or ongoing infection were enrolled for a total of 248 nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Overall, the COVID-VIRO® sensitivity was 96.7% (CI, 93.5%-99.9%). In asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients having symptoms for more than 4 days and those with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold value ≥ 32, the sensitivities were 100%, 95.8%, and 91.9%, respectively. The concordance between RT-qPCR and COVID VIRO® rapid test results was 100% for the 127 patients with no SARS-CoV-2 infection. The COVID-VIRO® test had 100% specificity and sensitivity greater than 95%, which are better than the recommendations set forth by the WHO (specificity ≥ 97%-100%, sensitivity ≥ 80%). These rapid tests may be particularly useful for large-scale screening in emergency departments, low-resource settings, and airports.
Keywords: SARS coronavirus; chromatographic techniques; local infection/replication/spread; pathogenesis; research and analysis methods; virus classification.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34730436 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0202921. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02029-21. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35107327 Free PMC article.
-
Saliva samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2932-2937. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26821. Epub 2021 Feb 9. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 33501645 Free PMC article.
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of the lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Jun 15;31(2):020601. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.020601. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021. PMID: 34140830 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010110. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35054277 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Greater public health impact of COVID-19 antigen detection tests.BMC Med. 2021 Mar 24;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01956-z. BMC Med. 2021. PMID: 33757504 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35741198 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ESCMID COVID-19 guidelines: diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jun;28(6):812-822. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022. PMID: 35218978 Free PMC article.
-
Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A scoping review.Oral Dis. 2022 Nov;28 Suppl 2:2362-2390. doi: 10.1111/odi.14216. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Oral Dis. 2022. PMID: 35445491 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous