Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;43(3):858-873.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26548. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Treatment tolerability and outcomes in elderly patients with head and neck cancer

Affiliations

Treatment tolerability and outcomes in elderly patients with head and neck cancer

Daniel R Dickstein et al. Head Neck. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The number of elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to grow. Management of this cohort remains poorly defined. We investigated treatment tolerability and clinical outcomes in this underrepresented population.

Methods: We identified patients aged ≥70 with nonrecurrent, nonmetastatic HNSCC treated curatively from 2007-2018 and analyzed clinical covariates.

Results: Two hundred and twenty patients with a median age of 75 (interquartile range:72-80) were identified. Age and comorbidities were not correlated with toxicity (P ≥ .05). Patients who experienced a treatment interruption had significantly greater weight loss (P = .042) and worse overall survival (OS) (P < .001), but not worse disease-specific survival (P = .45), or locoregional control (P = .21).

Conclusions: Treatment interruptions were associated with weight loss and worse OS, but not disease related outcomes, suggesting an interruption in the elderly may be a surrogate for another issue. In sum, our data should guide clinical trial design to benefit this growing, neglected cohort.

Keywords: elderly; geriatric; head and neck cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; treatment tolerability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Kaplan–Meier survival curves stratified by site. (A) Overall survival for patients stratified by primary site. Three-year overall survival was 78.1% (95% CI: 69.3–88.2), 59.3% (95% CI: 44.2–79.5), 34.6% (95% CI: 20.0–59.8), 55.1% (95% CI: 33.6–90.3), and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0) for tumors originating in the oropharynx, larynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, and nasopharynx respectively (P < .001). (B) Disease-specific survival for patients stratified by primary site. Three-year disease-specific survival was 87.4% (95% CI: 79.9–95.6), 82.1% (95% CI: 70.6–95.6), 60.5% (95% CI: 45.5–80.5), 59.3% (95% CI: 37.0–95.1), and 100.0% (95% CI, 100.0–100.0) for tumors originating in the oropharynx, larynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, and nasopharynx, respectively (P = .003). (C) Locoregional control for patients stratified by primary site. Three-year locoregional control was 83.7% (95% CI: 74.6–94.0), 75.5% (95% CI: 62.1–91.8), 51.0% (95% CI: 30.0–86.7), 74.1% (95% CI: 52.6–100.0), and 80.0% (95% CI, 51.6–100.0) for tumors originating in the oropharynx, larynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, and nasopharynx respectively (P = .012)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by age. (A) Overall survival for patients stratified by age. Three-year overall survival was 70.7% (95% CI: 62.9–79.5) and 48.7% (95% CI: 34.2–69.5) for patients age 70–80 and > 80, respectively (P = .007). (B) Disease-specific survival for patients stratified by age. Three-year disease-specific survival was 82.3% (95% CI: 75.7–89.5) and 73.0% (95% CI: 60.3–88.3) for patients age 70–80 and > 80, respectively (P = .27). (C) Locoregional control for patients stratified by age. Three-year locoregional control was 77.9% (95% CI: 70.4–86.2) and 64.7% (95% CI: 45.5–91.9) for patients age 70–80 and > 80, respectively (P = .29)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by performance status. (A) Overall survival for patients stratified by performance status. Three-year overall survival was 81.2% (95% CI: 69.3–95.2), 63.1% (95% CI: 53.3–74.8), and 48.0% (95% CI: 33.9–68.0) for patients with ECOG 0, ECOG 1, and ECOG 2 or 3 performance status, respectively (P < .001). (B) Disease-specific survival for patients stratified by performance status. Three-year locoregional control was 92.2% (95% CI: 83.4–100.0), 78.0% (95% CI: 69.4–87.6), and 64.0% (95% CI: 49.5–82.8) for patients with ECOG 0, ECOG 1, and ECOG 2 or 3 performance status, respectively (P = .001). (C) Locoregional control for patients stratified by performance status. Three-year locoregional control was 84.8% (95% CI: 72.3–99.5), 74.4% (95% CI: 64.8–85.4), and 62.6% (95% CI: 44.3–88.5) for patients with ECOG 0, ECOG 1, and ECOG 2 or 3 performance status, respectively (P = .019)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by AJCC eighth edition staging. (A) Overall survival stratified by stage. Three-year overall survival was 73.7% (95% CI: 63.4–85.8) and 58.3% (95% CI: 48.8–69.6) for patients with stage I/II and stage III/IV tumors, respectively (P < .001). (B) Disease-specific survival stratified by stage. Three-year locoregional control was 89.8% (95% CI: 82.6–97.6) and 71.5% (95% CI: 62.7–81.6) for patients with stage I/II and stage III/IV tumors, respectively (P = .002). (C) Locoregional control stratified by stage. Three-year locoregional control was 79.1% (95% CI: 68.6–91.3) and 72.4% (95% CI: 62.6–83.8) for patients with stage I/II and stage III/IV tumors, respectively (P = .081)
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by treatment interruption. (A) Overall survival for patients who experienced a treatment interruption and uninterrupted treatment. Three-year overall survival was 70.1% (95% CI: 61.2–80.3) and 62.5% (95% CI: 51.0–76.5) for patients who experienced uninterrupted and interrupted treatment, respectively (P = .010). (B) Disease-specific survival for patients who experienced a treatment interruption and uninterrupted treatment. Three-year overall survival was 82.5% (95% CI: 75.4–90.3) and 73.6% (95% CI: 62.1–87.2) for patients who experienced uninterrupted and interrupted treatment, respectively (P = .45). (C) Locoregional control for patients who experienced a treatment interruption and uninterrupted treatment. Three-year locoregional control was 82.0% (95% CI: 73.9–91.0) and 68.9% (95% CI: 56.0–84.7) for patients who experienced uninterrupted and interrupted treatment, respectively (P = .21)
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by CCI. (A) Overall survival for patients stratified by CCI. Three-year overall survival was 69.5% (95% CI: 60.9–79.2) and 58.0% (95% CI: 46.0–73.2) for patients with a CCI of 5/6 or a CCI ≥ 7 (P = .069). (B) Disease-specific survival for patients stratified by CCI. Three-year disease-specific survival was 82.5% (95% CI: 75.5–90.2) and 75.5% (95% CI: 64.6–87.6) for patients with a CCI of 5/6 or a CCI ≥ 7 (P = .52). (C) Locoregional control for patients stratified by CCI. Three-year locoregional control was 78.4% (95% CI: 70.4–87.3) and 68.5% (95% CI: 53.7–87.4) for patients with a CCI of 5/6 or a CCI ≥ 7 (P = .46)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;55(2):74–108. - PubMed
    1. Clayburgh DR. Grandis JR. 3 - molecular biology. In: Bell RB, Fernandes RP, Andersen PE, eds. Oral, Head and Neck Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018:79–89.
    1. Sikora AG. The changing demographics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(11):1915–1923. - PubMed
    1. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. National Cancer Institue; 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/. Accessed August 8, 2019.
    1. Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R. Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(22):4626–4631. - PubMed

Publication types