Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;36(2):1090-1097.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08375-4. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review

Laura Mazer  1 , Oliver Varban  2 , John R Montgomery  2 , Michael M Awad  3 , Allison Schulman  4
Affiliations

Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review

Laura Mazer et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Video-based case review for minimally invasive surgery is immensely valuable for education and quality improvement. Video review can improve technical performance, shorten the learning curve, disseminate new procedures, and improve learner satisfaction. Despite these advantages, it is underutilized in many institutions. So far, research has focused on the benefits of video, and there is relatively little information on barriers to routine utilization.

Methods: A 36-question survey was developed on video-based case review and distributed to the SAGES email list. The survey included closed and open-ended questions. Numeric responses and Likert scales were compared with t-test; open-ended responses were reviewed qualitatively through rapid thematic analysis to identify themes and sub-themes.

Results: 642 people responded to the survey for a response rate of 11%. 584 (91%) thought video would improve the quality of educational conferences. 435 qualitative responses on the value of video were analyzed, and benefits included (1) improved understanding, (2) increased objectivity, (3) better teaching, and (4) better audience engagement. Qualitative comments regarding specific barriers to recording and editing case video identified challenges at all stages of the process, from (1) the decision to record a case, (2) starting the recording in the OR, (3) transferring and storing files, and (4) editing the file. Each step had its own specific challenges.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgeons want to increase their utilization of video-based case review, but there are multiple practical challenges to overcome. Understanding these barriers is essential in order to increase use of video for education and quality improvement.

Keywords: Education; Implementation; Quality improvement; Survey; Video recording.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. SurgEndosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2973-9 - DOI
    1. Tonutti M, Elson DS, Yang GZ, Darzi AW, Sodergren MH (2017) The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions. Postgrad Med J. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134311 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brisbane W et al (2017) Utilization of a surgical video curriculum to augment resident learning. J Urol 197:e697–e698
    1. Mota P et al (2018) Video-based surgical learning: improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. J SurgEduc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.027 - DOI
    1. Norris S et al (2020) Effect of a surgical teaching video on resident performance of laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(7):1545–1551 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources