Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;49(7):949-962.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00777-1. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Meta-Analyses of the Associations Between Disinhibited Social Engagement Behaviors and Child Attachment Insecurity or Disorganization

Lory Zephyr  1 , Chantal Cyr  2   3 , Sébastien Monette  1   4 , Maude Archambault  1 , Stine Lehmann  5 , Helen Minnis  6
Affiliations
Free article
Review

Meta-Analyses of the Associations Between Disinhibited Social Engagement Behaviors and Child Attachment Insecurity or Disorganization

Lory Zephyr et al. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Children with disinhibited social engagement disorder show reduced reticence with strangers, do not check back with their caregiver after venturing away, and may willingly leave with an unfamiliar adult. The recent DSM-5 has moved away from an attachment framework to understand disinhibited social engagement behavior (DSEB) due to studies indicating its presence in previously institutionalized children even after these children are adopted and show a selective, more secure attachment with their substitute caregiver (e.g. Chisholm et al., 1998). This meta-analysis aims to clarify the size of the associations between DSEB and attachment insecurity or disorganization. It also examines whether studies effect sizes differ according to various moderators (e.g., child age, type of attachment and DSEB measures). The results (k = 24) showed that the associations between DSEB and attachment insecurity (d = 0.48) or attachment disorganization (d = 0.47) were of small magnitude. There were no publication biases. As for moderator analyses on both attachment insecurity and disorganization, the effect sizes in studies using DSEB observational measures (respectively d = 0.63 and 0.57) were of moderate magnitude and stronger than those in studies not using an observational component (respectively d = 0.28 and 0.32). Given these small-to-moderate associations, attachment can be considered a relationship process associated with DSEB, and attachment-informed interventions could be potential tools to reduce DSEB in children. Nevertheless, given the sizable unshared portion of variance between DSEB and child attachment, future studies should examine other variables related to caregiving and noncaregiving contexts to further understand DSEB.

Keywords: Child attachment; Disinhibited social engagement disorder; Disorganization; Institutionalization; Maltreatment; Neglect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford, England: Erlbaum.
    1. Allen, B. (2011). The use and abuse of attachment theory in clinical practice with maltreated children, part I: Diagnosis and assessment. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(1), 3–12. - DOI
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5e ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. United States: Wyley. - DOI
    1. Boris N.W., Hinshaw-Fuselier S.S., & Smyke A.T. (2004) Comparing criteria for attachment disorders: Establishing reliability and validity in high-risk samples. Journal of the American academy of child & adolescent psychiatry,43, 568–577.