Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247427.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247427. eCollection 2021.

The combination of MMSE with VSRAD and eZIS has greater accuracy for discriminating mild cognitive impairment from early Alzheimer's disease than MMSE alone

Affiliations

The combination of MMSE with VSRAD and eZIS has greater accuracy for discriminating mild cognitive impairment from early Alzheimer's disease than MMSE alone

Keita Tokumitsu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is assessed by carefully examining a patient's cognitive impairment. However, previous studies reported inadequate diagnostic accuracy for dementia in primary care settings. Many hospitals use the automated quantitative evaluation method known as the Voxel-based Specific Regional Analysis System for Alzheimer's Disease (VSRAD), wherein brain MRI data are used to evaluate brain morphological abnormalities associated with AD. Similarly, an automated quantitative evaluation application called the easy Z-score imaging system (eZIS), which uses brain SPECT data to detect regional cerebral blood flow decreases associated with AD, is widely used. These applications have several indicators, each of which is known to correlate with the degree of AD. However, it is not completely known whether these indicators work better when used in combination in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: We included 112 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 128 participants with early AD in this study. All participants underwent MRI, SPECT, and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed by univariate analysis, and logistic regression analysis with a combination of MMSE, VSRAD and eZIS indicators was performed to verify whether the diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between MCI and early AD was improved.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MMSE score alone was 0.835. The AUC was significantly improved to 0.870 by combining the MMSE score with two quantitative indicators from the VSRAD and eZIS that assessed the extent of brain abnormalities.

Conclusion: Compared with the MMSE score alone, the combination of the MMSE score with the VSRAD and eZIS indicators significantly improves the accuracy of discrimination between patients with MCI and early AD. Implementing VSRAD and eZIS does not require professional clinical experience in the treatment of dementia. Therefore, the accuracy of dementia diagnosis by physicians may easily be improved in real-world primary care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Norio Yasui-Furukori has been a speaker for Dainippon Sumitomo Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and MSD. Kazutaka Shimoda has received research support from Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Pfizer Inc., Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and honoraria from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Pfizer Inc. and Eisai Co., Ltd. The companies had no role in the study design, the data collection or analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests to report. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mayeux R, Stern Y. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2012;2(8). Epub 2012/08/22. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006239 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reitz C, Brayne C, Mayeux R. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Nature reviews Neurology. 2011;7(3):137–52. Epub 2011/02/10. 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, Ganguli M, Jeste DV, Paulsen JS, et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nature reviews Neurology. 2014;10(11):634–42. Epub 2014/10/01. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K, et al. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet (London, England). 2006;367(9518):1262–70. Epub 2006/04/25. 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68542-5 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malek-Ahmadi M. Reversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition: A Meta-Analysis. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2016;30(4):324–30. Epub 2016/02/26. 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000145 . - DOI - PubMed