Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun:122:104885.
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104885. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective

Affiliations
Review

Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective

Jacqueline Allan et al. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Nanotechnology and more particularly nanotechnology-based products and materials have provided a huge potential for novel solutions to many of the current challenges society is facing. However, nanotechnology is also an area of product innovation that is sometimes developing faster than regulatory frameworks. This is due to the high complexity of some nanomaterials, the lack of a globally harmonised regulatory definition and the different scopes of regulation at a global level. Research organisations and regulatory bodies have spent many efforts in the last two decades to cope with these challenges. Although there has been a significant advancement related to analytical approaches for labelling purposes as well as to the development of suitable test guidelines for nanomaterials and their safety assessment, there is a still a need for greater global collaboration and consensus in the regulatory field. Furthermore, with growing societal concerns on plastic litter and tiny debris produced by degradation of littered plastic objects, the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on humans and the environment is an emerging issue. Despite increasing research and initial regulatory discussions on micro- and nanoplastics, there are still knowledge gaps and thus an urgent need for action. As nanoplastics can be classified as a specific type of incidental nanomaterials, current and future scientific investigations should take into account the existing profound knowledge on nanotechnology/nanomaterials when discussing issues around nanoplastics. This review was conceived at the 2019 Global Summit on Regulatory Sciences that took place in Stresa, Italy, on 24-26 September 2019 (GSRS 2019) and which was co-organised by the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) and the European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC). The GCRSR consists of regulatory bodies from various countries around the globe including EU bodies. The 2019 Global Summit provided an excellent platform to exchange the latest information on activities carried out by regulatory bodies with a focus on the application of nanotechnology in the agriculture/food sector, on nanoplastics and on nanomedicines, including taking stock and promoting further collaboration. Recently, the topic of micro- and nanoplastics has become a new focus of the GCRSR. Besides discussing the challenges and needs, some future directions on how new tools and methodologies can improve the regulatory science were elaborated by summarising a significant portion of discussions during the summit. It has been revealed that there are still some uncertainties and knowledge gaps with regard to physicochemical properties, environmental behaviour and toxicological effects, especially as testing described in the dossiers is often done early in the product development process, and the material in the final product may behave differently. The harmonisation of methodologies for quantification and risk assessment of nanomaterials and micro/nanoplastics, the documentation of regulatory science studies and the need for sharing databases were highlighted as important aspects to look at.

Keywords: GSRS; Harmonisation; Nanomaterials; Nanoplastics; Nanotechnology; Regulatory science; Standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Topics discussed at GSRS2019.

References

    1. Addamo A.M. 2018. Top marine beach litter items in Europe: a review and synthesis based on beach litter data. EUR 29249 EN.
    1. Akthar N. 2019. Challenges of developing commercial nanomedicines. Private communication at global Summit on regulatory science 2019 on nanotechnology and nanoplastics. EUR 30195 EN.
    1. Al-Albed, Detecting nanoplastics in the environment: adapting existing methods from nanotechnology. Private communication at global Summit on regulatory science 2019 on nanotechnology and nanoplastics. EUR 30195 EN.
    1. Alexy P. Managing the analytical challenges related to micro-and nanoplastics in the environment and food: filling the knowledge gaps. Food Addit. Contam. 2020;37:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Amenta V. Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/food sector in EU and non EU countries. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015;73:463–476. - PubMed

MeSH terms