Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;62(1):34-38.
doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019155. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?

Affiliations

Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?

Jiun Lee et al. Singapore Med J. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Two strategies are available for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis - clinical risk factor-based screening and routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation. In our hospital, we switched from the former to the latter approach in 2014.

Methods: We compared the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis during 2001-2015 between infants born to pregnant women who were screened for GBS colonisation and those born to women who were not screened.

Results: Among 41,143 live births, there were nine cases of early-onset GBS sepsis. All infants with GBS sepsis were born to pregnant women who were not screened for GBS colonisation. The incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis among infants of women who were not screened was 0.41 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.77) when compared to infants of women who were screened, for whom the sepsis incidence was zero per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0-0.19; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Our data suggests that routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation is a better preventive strategy for early-onset GBS sepsis in neonates when compared to clinical risk factor-based screening.

Keywords: group B streptococcal; neonatal; prevention; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bizzarro MJ, Raskind C, Baltimore RS, Gallagher PG. Seventy-five years of neonatal sepsis at Yale:1928-2003. Pediatrics. 2005;116:595–602. - PubMed
    1. Chow KK, Tay L, Lam C. A prospective study of group B streptococcal colonization in parturient mothers and their infants. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1981;10:79–83. - PubMed
    1. Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, et al. Active Bacterial Core surveillance/Emerging Infections Program Network. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 2008;299:2056–65. - PubMed
    1. Edwards MS, Nizet V, Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal infections. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, Nizet V, Maldonado YA, editors. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2011. pp. 222–75.
    1. Yow MD, Mason EO, Leeds LJ, et al. Ampicillin prevents intrapartum transmission of group B streptococcus. JAMA. 1979;241:1245–7. - PubMed

MeSH terms