Vertebral body changes after continuous spinal distraction in scoliotic children
- PMID: 33619647
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06775-7
Vertebral body changes after continuous spinal distraction in scoliotic children
Abstract
Purpose: Growth-friendly spinal implants (GFSI) were established for scoliotic children as an interim solution until definite spinal fusion could be performed during puberty. While deformity control was clearly proven, the effects on vertebral shape and morphology are still unclear. Our prospective study assesses the effect of GFSI with continuous distraction on vertebral body shape and volume in SMA children in comparison with previously untreated age-matched SMA patients.
Methods: Cohort I (n = 19, age 13.2 years) were SMA patients without prior surgical scoliosis treatment. Cohort II (n = 24, age 12.4 years) were children, who had continuous spinal distraction with GFSI for 4.5 years. Radiographic measurements and computed tomography (CT) 3D volume rendering were performed before definite spinal fusion. For cohort II, additional radiographs were analyzed before the first surgical implantation of GFSI, after surgery and every year thereafter.
Results: Our analysis revealed decreased depth and volume in scoliotic patients with prior GFSI compared to scoliotic patients without prior implants. This difference was significant for the lower thoracic and entire lumbar spine. Vertebral body height and pedicle size were unchanged between the two cohorts.
Conclusion: CT data showed volume reduction in the vertebral body in scoliotic children after GFSI treatment. This effect was more severe in the lumbar and lower thoracic area. While vertebral height was identical in both groups, vertebral depth was reduced in the GFSI-treated group. Reduced vertebral depth and altered vertebral morphology should be considered before instrumenting the spine in previously treated scoliotic SMA children.
Level of evidence iii: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Keywords: CT; Growth-friendly implants; Scoliosis; Vertebral body shape; Vertebral volume.
© 2021. The Author(s).
References
-
- Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Muntoni F et al (2018) Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul Disord 28:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.11.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shorrock HK, Gillingwater TH, Groen EJN (2018) Overview of current drugs and molecules in development for spinal muscular atrophy therapy. Drugs 78:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0868-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Perrone M, Orr R, Hing W et al (2018) The impact of backpack loads on school children: a critical narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112529 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hell AK, Groenefeld K, Tsaknakis K et al (2018) Combining bilateral magnetically controlled implants inserted parallel to the spine with rib to pelvis fixation: surgical technique and early results. Clin Spine Surg 31:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000614 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lorenz HM, Badwan B, Hecker MM et al (2017) Magnetically controlled devices parallel to the spine in children with spinal muscular atrophy. JB JS Open Access 2:e0036. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00036 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials