Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500
- PMID: 33619690
- DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01748-7
Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and agreement between Fully Refocused Steady-State magnetic resonance sequences (FRSS) and the IOLMaster® 500 optical biometer for measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL).
Methods: In a sample of 32 healthy volunteers, separate observers measured the ACD and AL of both eyes using both techniques (inter-method) and through repeated FRSS measurements (interobserver) and by the same observer (intraobserver). We employed the Bland-Altman method to determine the agreement between FRSS and partial coherence interferometry (using the IOLMaster®) and the interobserver and intraobserver variability, providing the limits of agreement (LoA, or mean difference ± 1.96 SD). Correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients were also provided.
Results: For ACD measurements with FRSS in pseudo-color scale, we obtained an LoA of 0.016 ± 0.266 mm compared with partial coherence interferometry. For AL with FRSS in greyscale, the LoA was 0.019 ± 0.383 mm. Maximum interobserver variability showed a - 0.036 ± 0.247 mm LoA for ACD with FRSS in pseudo-color scale. Maximum intraobserver variability was 0.000 ± 0.157 mm LoA for AL with FRSS in greyscale.
Conclusions: ACD and AL measurements using FRSS sequencing present high LoA and reliability when compared with partial coherence interferometry using the IOLMaster® 500. The results were better for FRSS in pseudo-color scale in ACD determination and for FRSS in greyscale in AL determination. FRSS would not be recommended for IOL power calculation due to variability of AL measurement.
Keywords: Anterior chamber; Eye axial length; Interferometry; Magnetic resonance imaging.
Similar articles
-
Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry : intraobserver and interobserver reliability.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01214-7. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001. PMID: 11738911
-
An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700 and its agreement with the IOLMaster v3 in children.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Jan;42(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/opo.12918. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022. PMID: 34761427
-
Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;101(4):493-498. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308352. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27503393
-
Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0193023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29486009 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;32(4):257-264. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0091. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 30091303 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wu Y, Liu S, Liao R (2017) Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0439-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Yanagisawa M, Yamashita T, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Murata H, Asaoka R (2018) Changes in axial length and progression of visual field damage in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(1):407–417. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22949 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang W, Li X, Chen S, Huang W, Zhang X (2018) Biometric differences between unilateral chronic primary angle closure glaucoma and fellow non-glaucomatous eyes. Semin Ophthalmol 33(5):595–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2017.1375121 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS (2008) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f1c5ad - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chia TMT, Nguyen MT, Jung HC (2018) Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio. Clin Ophthalmol 12:1757–1762. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.S170301 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources