Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;52(2):919-926.
doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00451-0. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Effect of dry sanitizing methods on Bacillus cereus biofilm

Affiliations

Effect of dry sanitizing methods on Bacillus cereus biofilm

Andréia Miho Morishita Harada et al. Braz J Microbiol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Bacillus cereus is a relevant foodborne pathogen and biofilm producer which can contaminate and persist in the processing environment of both high and low water activity foods. Because of this, it is crucial to understand better the resistance of this pathogen biofilm to different sanitation methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dry sanitizing treatments against B. cereus biofilm formed on stainless steel (SS) and polypropylene (PP). Biofilm formation was held through the static method at 25 °C. After 4 days of incubation, coupons were exposed for up to 30 min to UV-C light, dry heat, gaseous ozone, 70% ethanol, and a commercial sanitizer. Sodium hypochlorite (200 mg/l) was also tested in two different pH values (7 and 11) for comparison purposes. In general, the surface material did not influence (p > 0.05) the performance of the treatments. From 10 min of exposure, 70% ethanol and the commercial product caused the lowest reductions on both surfaces. In addition, dry heat exhibited a poor performance on PP, with reductions < 1 log CFU/cm2. UV-C light on SS and PP and ozone on PP achieved reductions around 2 log CFU/cm2 after 30 min. The same level of reduction was obtained after 5 or 10 min using sodium hypochlorite (200 mg/l). Therefore, the results showed that dry sanitizing methods are not as effective as sodium hypochlorite against B. cereus biofilms. Further studies to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of dry methods are necessary.

Keywords: Bacillus cereus; Biofilm; Dry sanitation; Food contact surfaces; Food hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biofilm formation and sanitizing protocol scheme
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of sanitizing protocols against Bacillus cereus biofilm formed on stainless steel ( formula image) and polypropylene ( formula image) coupons. a 70% ethanol, b commercial product, c dry heat, d UV-C light, e gaseous ozone, f sodium hypochlorite (200 mg/l) pH 7, and g sodium hypochlorite (200 mg/l) pH 11; (---) count below the limit of detection (< 1.69 log CFU/cm2). N0, initial population; N, population after treatment. Bars represent standard deviation. All the experiments were performed three times

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peng JS, Tsai WC, Chou CC. Inactivation and removal of Bacillus cereus by sanitizer and detergent. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;77:11–18. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00060-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Codex (2015) Code of Hygienic Practice for Low-Moisture Foods. CAC/RCP:75–2015
    1. Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ. A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT. 2010;43:573–583. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008. - DOI
    1. Glasset B, Herbin S, Guillier L, Cadel-Six S, Vignaud M, Grout J, Pairaud S, Michel V, Hennekinne J, Ramarao N, Brisabois A (2016) Bacillus cereus-induced food-borne outbreaks in France, 2007 to 2014: Epidemiology and genetic characterisation. Eurosurveillance 21(48). 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.48.30413 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Majed R, Faille C, Kallassy M, Gohar M. Bacillus cereus biofilms-same, only different. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources