Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;10(5):e019506.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019506. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Clinical Application of Serologic Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Contemporary Cardiovascular Practice

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Application of Serologic Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Contemporary Cardiovascular Practice

Abdulla A Damluji et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

In patients with cardiovascular disease, the use of antibody or serological testing is frequently encountered as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to evolve. Antibody testing detects one form of the acquired immunological response to a pathogenic antigen. Once the immune system recognizes a viral antigen or a protein as foreign, a humoral immune response is initiated, which is generally detected by laboratory testing in 5 to 10 days after the initial exposure. While this information is critical from a public health perspective to implement surveillance systems and measures to limit infectivity and transmission rate, the misinterpretation of serologic testing in clinical practice has generated much confusion in the medical community because some attempted to apply these strategies to individual patient's treatment schemes. In this mini-review, we examine the different serologic-based testing strategies, how to interpret their results, and their public health impact at the population level, which are critical to contain the transmission of the virus in the community within a busy cardiovascular practice. Further, this review will also be particularly helpful as vaccination and immune therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 become available to the society as a whole.

Keywords: COVID‐19; cardiovascular diseases; immunity; serologic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Christenson discloses honoraria, consulting, and scientific advisory board participation with Siemens Healthineers, Roche Diagnostic (and Medscape), Beckman‐Coulter, PixCell, Quidel Corporation, BD Diagnostics and Sphingotec. Dr Christenson receives research funding from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, Beckman‐Coulter, Mitsubushi, Abbott Diagnostics, Quidel Corporation, Becton Dickinson, Sphingotech (NexusDx), Ortho Clinical Diagnostics and PixCell. Dr deFilippi reports consulting fees from Abbott Diagnostics, FujiRebio, Quidel, Ortho Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers. Dr Damluji has no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Serology‐based testing to SARS‐COV‐2.
The figure illustrates the protein antigens of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: nucleocapsid phosphoprotein, spike full‐length protein, and receptor binding domain and the 2 most common serology‐based testing strategies: enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescent immunoassay. PRNT50 indicates 50% plaque reduction neutralization test; and SARS‐COV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The nucleocapsid protein is not shown in the illustration because it is attached to the viral RNA. The illustration only shows the surface proteins; the orange proteins represent the phospholipid bilayer. The blue/purple 5‐part proteins represent viroporin pentamers, also called E proteins.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Positive predictive value for 2 testing strategies by prevalence of COVID‐19 in a hypothetical situation.
COVID‐19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019. Data derived from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019‐ncov/lab/resources/antibody‐tests‐guidelines.html/.

References

    1. Peeling RW, Wedderburn CJ, Garcia PJ, Boeras D, Fongwen N, Nkengasong J, Sall A, Tanuri A, Heymann DL. Serology testing in the covid‐19 pandemic response. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:e245–e249. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30517-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long Q‐X, Tang X‐J, Shi Q‐L, Li Q, Deng H‐J, Yuan J, Hu J‐L, Xu W, Zhang Y, Lv F‐J, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. Nat Med. 2020;26:1200–1204. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petherick A. Developing antibody tests for SARS‐CoV‐2. Lancet. 2020;395:1101–1102. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30788-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tai W, He L, Zhang X, Pu J, Voronin D, Jiang S, Zhou Y, Du L. Characterization of the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccine. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17:613–620. DOI: 10.1038/s41423-020-0400-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryant JE, Azman AS, Ferrari MJ, Arnold BF, Boni MF, Hayford K, Luquero FJ, Mina MJ, Rodriguez‐Barraquer I, et al. Serology for SARS‐CoV‐2: apprehensions, opportunities, and the path forward. Sci Immunol. 2020;5:eabc6347. DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abc6347. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances