Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar 15;46(6):E398-E410.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003789.

Clinical Benefit of Rehabilitation Training in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Clinical Benefit of Rehabilitation Training in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ruimeng Duan et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of different rehabilitation interventions in spinal cord injury.

Summary of background data: Several activity-based interventions have been widely applied in spinal cord injury in the past, but the effects of these rehabilitation exercises are controversial.

Methods: Publications were searched from databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, the database of the U.S. National Institutes of Health and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) using the searching terms like spinal cord injury, transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, activity-based therapy, and robotic-assisted locomotor training. Randomized controlled trials and controlled trials were included. The primary outcomes included functional upper/lower extremity independence, walking capacity, spasticity, and life quality of individuals with spinal cord injury. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.0 software.

Results: Thirty-one articles were included. Meta-analysis showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation improved walking speed (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01, 0.16) and lower extremity function (95% CI 1.55, 7.27); functional electrical stimulation significantly increased upper extremity independence (95% CI 0.37, 5.48). Robotic-assisted treadmill training improved lower extremity function (95% CI 3.44, 6.56) compared with related controls.

Conclusion: Activity-based intervention like transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, and robotic-assisted treadmill training are effective in improving function in individuals with spinal cord injury.Level of Evidence: 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • TO THE EDITOR.
    Chang MC. Chang MC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jul 15;46(14):E797. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004107. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 34160376 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eng JJ, Teasell R, Miller WC, et al. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence: methods of the SCIRE systematic review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2007; 13:1–10.
    1. Schwartz I, Sajina A, Neeb M, et al. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49:1062–1067.
    1. Nasser MET, Reda MAEH, Awad MR, et al. Effect of massed practice and somatosensory stimulation on the upper extremity function in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Alexandria J Med 2014; 50:189–196.
    1. Henao-Lema CP, Pérez-Parra JE. Adherence to functional neurorehabilitation processes and their relation to disability and quality of life in Colombian adults with spinal cord injury. Rev Fac Med 2016; 64:69–77.
    1. Niu X, Varoqui D, Kindig M, et al. Prediction of gait recovery in spinal cord injured individuals trained with robotic gait orthosis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014; 11:42.

MeSH terms