Magnetization-prepared 2 Rapid Gradient-Echo MRI for B1 Insensitive 3D T1 Mapping of Hip Cartilage: An Experimental and Clinical Validation
- PMID: 33620288
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021200085
Magnetization-prepared 2 Rapid Gradient-Echo MRI for B1 Insensitive 3D T1 Mapping of Hip Cartilage: An Experimental and Clinical Validation
Abstract
Background Often used for T1 mapping of hip cartilage, three-dimensional (3D) dual-flip-angle (DFA) techniques are highly sensitive to flip angle variations related to B1 inhomogeneities. The authors hypothesized that 3D magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo (MP2RAGE) MRI would help provide more accurate T1 mapping of hip cartilage at 3.0 T than would 3D DFA techniques. Purpose To compare 3D MP2RAGE MRI with 3D DFA techniques using two-dimensional (2D) inversion recovery T1 mapping as a standard of reference for hip cartilage T1 mapping in phantoms, healthy volunteers, and participants with hip pain. Materials and Methods T1 mapping at 3.0 T was performed in phantoms and in healthy volunteers using 3D MP2RAGE MRI and 3D DFA techniques with B1 field mapping for flip angle correction. Participants with hip pain prospectively (July 2019-January 2020) underwent indirect MR arthrography (with intravenous administration of 0.2 mmol/kg of gadoterate meglumine), including 3D MP2RAGE MRI. A 2D inversion recovery-based sequence served as a T1 reference in phantoms and in participants with hip pain. In healthy volunteers, cartilage T1 was compared between 3D MP2RAGE MRI and 3D DFA techniques. Paired t tests and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results Eleven phantoms, 10 healthy volunteers (median age, 27 years; range, 26-30 years; five men), and 20 participants with hip pain (mean age, 34 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 17 women) were evaluated. In phantoms, T1 bias from 2D inversion recovery was lower for 3D MP2RAGE MRI than for 3D DFA techniques (mean, 3 msec ± 11 vs 253 msec ± 85; P < .001), and, unlike 3D DFA techniques, the deviation found with MP2RAGE MRI did not correlate with increasing B1 deviation. In healthy volunteers, regional cartilage T1 difference (109 msec ± 163; P = .008) was observed only for the 3D DFA technique. In participants with hip pain, the mean T1 bias of 3D MP2RAGE MRI from 2D inversion recovery was -23 msec ± 31 (P < .001). Conclusion Compared with three-dimensional (3D) dual-flip-angle techniques, 3D magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient-echo MRI enabled more accurate T1 mapping of hip cartilage, was less affected by B1 inhomogeneities, and showed high accuracy against a T1 reference in participants with hip pain. © RSNA, 2021.
Similar articles
-
Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of articular cartilage: three-dimensional T1 mapping with variable flip angles and B1 correction.Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):865-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531081115. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Radiology. 2009. PMID: 19703855
-
Black-Blood Magnetization Prepared 2 Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echoes: A Fast and Three-Dimensional MR Black-Blood T1 Mapping Technique for Quantitative Assessment of Atherosclerosis and Venous Thrombosis.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Sep;60(3):1148-1162. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29156. Epub 2023 Nov 27. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38009385
-
Simultaneous Bilateral T1, T2, and T1ρ Relaxation Mapping of Hip Joint With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul;62(1):160-173. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29679. Epub 2024 Dec 24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39718435
-
2D versus 3D MRI of osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research.Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(11):2211-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04309-4. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Skeletal Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36907953 Review.
-
3D MRI of Articular Cartilage.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021 Jun;25(3):397-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730913. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34547805 Review.
Cited by
-
Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Oct;56(4):1042-1052. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28127. Epub 2022 Feb 27. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35224803 Free PMC article.
-
A deep learning approach for automatic 3D segmentation of hip cartilage and labrum from direct hip MR arthrography.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):4662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86727-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39920175 Free PMC article.
-
[Imaging in joint-preserving hip surgery].Radiologe. 2022 Mar;62(3):271-284. doi: 10.1007/s00117-022-00973-0. Epub 2022 Mar 3. Radiologe. 2022. PMID: 35238995 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
[Preoperative MR imaging for hip dysplasia : Assessment of associated deformities and intraarticular pathologies].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;52(4):300-312. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04356-8. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 36976331 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
Current and Future Advanced Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip.Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Sep 14;14:327-338. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S357498. eCollection 2022. Orthop Res Rev. 2022. PMID: 36131944 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical