Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:431:103-125.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65481-8_5.

Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies

Affiliations

Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies

Vanessa Szott et al. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2021.

Abstract

Although extensive research has been carried out to describe the transmission pathways of Campylobacter entering livestock farms, the role of livestock farms as source of Campylobacter contamination of the environment is still poorly investigated. It is assumed that Campylobacter-positive livestock farms contribute to an environmental contamination, depending on the animal species on the farm, their Campylobacter status, the housing system, manure management as well as their general farm hygienic and biosecurity management. Different emission sources, like manure, air, water, insects and rodents as well as personnel, including equipment and vehicles, contribute to Campylobacter emission into the environment. Even though Campylobacter are rather fastidious bacteria, they are able to survive in the environment for even a longer period of time, when environmental conditions enable survival in specific niches. We conclude that a significant reduction of Campylobacter emission in the environment can be successfully achieved if various intervention strategies, depending on the farm type, are applied simultaneously, including proper general and personal hygiene, establishing of hygienic barriers, insect controls, manure management and hygienization of stables, barns and exhaust air.

Keywords: Campylobacter; Emission; Farm environment; Intervention; Livestock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abley MJ, Wittum TE, Moeller SJ, Zerby HN, Funk JA (2012) Quantification of campylobacter in swine before, during, and after the slaughter process. J Food Prot 75(1):139–143. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abley MJ, Wittum TE, Zerby HN, Funk JA (2012) Quantification of Campylobacter and Salmonella in cattle before, during, and after the slaughter process. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9(2):113–119. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.0931 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adkin A, Hartnett E, Jordan L, Newell D, Davison H (2006) Use of a systematic review to assist the development of Campylobacter control strategies in broilers. J Appl Microbiol 100(2):306–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02781.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agunos A, Waddell L, Leger D, Taboada E (2014) A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens. PLoS One 9 (8):e104905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104905
    1. Ahmed MF, Schulz J, Hartung J (2013) Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock. Ann Agric Environ Med 20(1):16–20 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources