Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;49(3):321-329.
doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00463-8. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food

Affiliations

The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food

Shayla M Jackson et al. Learn Behav. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

A previous study failed to find evidence that dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate between 1 and 5 hot dog slices presented on a single trial (Horowitz et al., Learning and Motivation, 44, 207-217, 2013). In the experiments reported here, multiple trials were used to test dogs' ability to use olfaction to choose one of two opaque containers under which a larger number of food items was placed. In Experiment 1, dogs chose between 1 and 5 hot dog slices. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined dogs' ability to discriminate between numbers of hot dog slices that varied in the numerical distance and the ratio between the smaller and larger quantities. Experiment 4 explored olfactory discrimination between quantities of a different food, dog kibble. Experiments 1-3 all showed that dogs used olfactory stimuli to choose the larger number of hot dog slices, but Experiments 2 and 3 revealed no effects of distance or ratio between numerical quantities. In Experiment 4, dogs failed to discriminate between 1 and 5 pieces of dog kibble. Factors that allow dogs to use olfactory cues to discriminate between quantities are discussed.

Keywords: Distance effect; Dog; Food type; Olfaction; Quantity discrimination; Ratio effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beran, M. J. (2001). Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.181 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brannon, E. M., & Merritt, D. J. (2011). Evolutionary foundations of the approximate number system. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 207–224). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00014-1
    1. Cablk, M. E., Sagebiel, J. C., Heaton, J. S., & Valentin, C. (2008). Olfaction-based detection distance: A quantitative analysis of how far away dogs recognize tortoise odor and follow it to source. Sensors, 8, 2208–2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8042208 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Dehaene, S. (2001). Subtracting pigeons: Logarithmic or linear? Psychological Science, 12, 244–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/SO166-2236(98)01263-6

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources