The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food
- PMID: 33620699
- DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00463-8
The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food
Abstract
A previous study failed to find evidence that dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate between 1 and 5 hot dog slices presented on a single trial (Horowitz et al., Learning and Motivation, 44, 207-217, 2013). In the experiments reported here, multiple trials were used to test dogs' ability to use olfaction to choose one of two opaque containers under which a larger number of food items was placed. In Experiment 1, dogs chose between 1 and 5 hot dog slices. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined dogs' ability to discriminate between numbers of hot dog slices that varied in the numerical distance and the ratio between the smaller and larger quantities. Experiment 4 explored olfactory discrimination between quantities of a different food, dog kibble. Experiments 1-3 all showed that dogs used olfactory stimuli to choose the larger number of hot dog slices, but Experiments 2 and 3 revealed no effects of distance or ratio between numerical quantities. In Experiment 4, dogs failed to discriminate between 1 and 5 pieces of dog kibble. Factors that allow dogs to use olfactory cues to discriminate between quantities are discussed.
Keywords: Distance effect; Dog; Food type; Olfaction; Quantity discrimination; Ratio effect.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
An investigation on the olfactory capabilities of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2022 Dec;25(6):1567-1577. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01640-6. Epub 2022 Jun 11. Anim Cogn. 2022. PMID: 35689114
-
What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task?Behav Processes. 2016 Jan;122:90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 19. Behav Processes. 2016. PMID: 26601897
-
Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0042-7. Epub 2006 Aug 29. Anim Cogn. 2007. PMID: 16941158
-
Landmark discrimination learning in the dog: effects of age, an antioxidant fortified food, and cognitive strategy.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 Oct;26(6):679-95. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00039-8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002. PMID: 12479842 Review.
-
What smells? Gauging attention to olfaction in canine cognition research.Anim Cogn. 2020 Jan;23(1):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01311-z. Epub 2019 Oct 12. Anim Cogn. 2020. PMID: 31606800 Review.
Cited by
-
Success in the Natural Detection Task is influenced by only a few factors generally believed to affect dogs' olfactory performance.Sci Rep. 2024 May 29;14(1):12351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62957-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38811746 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Chemosensoric Properties of Commercially Available Dog Foods Using Electronic Sensors and GC-MS/O Analysis.Molecules. 2023 Jul 19;28(14):5509. doi: 10.3390/molecules28145509. Molecules. 2023. PMID: 37513381 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beran, M. J. (2001). Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.181 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Brannon, E. M., & Merritt, D. J. (2011). Evolutionary foundations of the approximate number system. In S. Dehaene & E. Brannon (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (pp. 207–224). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00014-1
-
- Cablk, M. E., Sagebiel, J. C., Heaton, J. S., & Valentin, C. (2008). Olfaction-based detection distance: A quantitative analysis of how far away dogs recognize tortoise odor and follow it to source. Sensors, 8, 2208–2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8042208 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Dehaene, S. (2001). Subtracting pigeons: Logarithmic or linear? Psychological Science, 12, 244–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00343 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/SO166-2236(98)01263-6
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources