A meta-analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population
- PMID: 33620735
- PMCID: PMC8518930
- DOI: 10.1111/add.15449
A meta-analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population
Abstract
Background and aims: Few meta-analyses have been conducted to pool the most constant risk factors for problem gambling. The present meta-analysis summarizes effect sizes of the most frequently assessed problem gambling risk factors, ranks them according to effect size strength and identifies any differences in effects across genders.
Method: A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted on jurisdiction-wide gambling prevalence surveys on the general adult population published until March 2019. One hundred and four studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The number of participants varied depending on the risk factor analyzed, and ranged from 5327 to 273 946 (52% female). Weighted mean odds ratios were calculated for 57 risk factors (socio-demographic, psychosocial, gambling activity and substance use correlates), allowing them to be ranked from largest to smallest with regard to their association with problem gambling.
Results: The highest odds ratio (OR) was for internet gambling [OR = 7.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.24, 10.99, P < 0.000] and the lowest was for employment status (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.87, 1.22, P = 0.718). The largest effect sizes were generally in the gambling activity category and the smallest were in the socio-demographic category. No differences were found across genders for age-associated risk.
Conclusions: A meta-analysis of 104 studies of gambling prevalence indicated that the most frequently assessed problem gambling risk factors with the highest effect sizes are associated with continuous-play format gambling products.
Keywords: Epidemiology; gambling; gambling disorder; general population; meta-analysis; odds ratio; problem gambling; relative risk; risk factor.
© 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.
Figures
References
-
- Williams R. J., Volberg R. A., Stevens R. M. The Population Prevalence of Problem Gambling: Methodological Influences, Standardized Rates, Jurisdictional Differences, and Worldwide Trends. Thunder Bay, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2012.
-
- Raylu N., Oei T. P. S. Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review. Clin Psychol Rev 2002; 22: 1009–1061. - PubMed
-
- Johansson A., Grant J. E., Kim S. W., Odlaug B. L., Götestam K. G. Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review. J Gambl Stud 2009; 25: 67–92. - PubMed
-
- Dowling N. A., Merkouris S. S., Greenwood C. J., Oldenhof E., Toumbourou J. W., Youssef G. J. Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2017; 51: 109–124. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
