Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Apr 20;39(12):1317-1328.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01366. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

ROBUST: A Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP Versus Placebo Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated Patients With ABC-Type Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

ROBUST: A Phase III Study of Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP Versus Placebo Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated Patients With ABC-Type Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Grzegorz S Nowakowski et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) historically showed inferior survival with standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Phase II studies demonstrated that adding the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide to R-CHOP improved outcomes in ABC-type DLBCL. The goal of the global, phase III ROBUST study was to compare lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) with placebo/R-CHOP in previously untreated, ABC-type DLBCL.

Methods: Histology and cell-of-origin type were prospectively analyzed by central pathology prior to random assignment and study treatment. Patients with ABC-DLBCL received lenalidomide oral 15 mg/d, days 1-14/21 plus standard R-CHOP21 versus placebo/R-CHOP21 for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central radiology review.

Results: A total of 570 patients with ABC-DLBCL (n = 285 per arm) were stratified by International Prognostic Index score, age, and bulky disease, and randomly assigned to R2-CHOP or placebo/R-CHOP. Baseline demographics were similar between arms. Most patients completed six cycles of treatment: 74% R2-CHOP and 84% placebo/R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for R2-CHOP versus placebo/R-CHOP were neutropenia (60% v 48%), anemia (22% v 14%), thrombocytopenia (17% v 11%), and leukopenia (14% v 15%). The primary end point of PFS was not met, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.14) and P = .29; median PFS has not been reached for either arm. PFS trends favoring R2-CHOP over placebo/R-CHOP were seen in patients with higher-risk disease.

Conclusion: ROBUST is the first DLBCL phase III study to integrate biomarker-driven identification of eligible ABC patients. Although the ROBUST trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS in all patients, the safety profile of R2-CHOP was consistent with individual treatments with no new safety signals.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02285062.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/GileadResearch Funding: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys Annalisa ChiappellaHonoraria: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen Oncology, Roche, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, iQone David W. ScottConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech, NanoString TechnologiesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Named inventor on a pending patent describing gene expression profiling in prognostication in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. As a member of the LLMPP I am potentially a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to assign cell-of-origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. I am a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to determine the proliferation signature in mantle cell lymphoma. Named inventor on a pending patent describing using gene expression profiling to identify molecular subtypes of GCB-DLBCL. Wojciech JurczakResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Merck, Loxo, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene Muhit ÖzcanHonoraria: TakedaResearch Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer, Merck, Archigen Biotech, Roche, Pharmacyclics, AbbvieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abdi Ibrahim, Amgen, Janssen David BeladaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Debiopharm GroupResearch Funding: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Pharmacyclics, Archigen BiotechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Roche Juan Miguel BerguaConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi SankyoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Dok Hyun YoonHonoraria: Celltrion, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Samyang, Kirin PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen, Amgen¸Celgene, Green CrossResearch Funding: Samyang, Abclone, Roche/Genentech, Janssen Oncology, Amgen, Genmab, Boryung Federica CavalloHonoraria: Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Kazuhito YamamotoHonoraria: Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmacuetical, Chugai Pharma, Novartis, Otsuka, Mundipharma, Eisai, MSD, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Sanofi, Nippon Shinyaku, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celgene, HUYA Bioscience International, Stemline Therapeutics, Eisai, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbvieResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma, Novartis, ARIAD, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Ono Pharmaceutical, Celgene, Solasia Pharma, MSD, Eisai, Zenyaku Kogyo, Bayer, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Mundipharma, Yakult Pharmaceutical Koji IzutsuHonoraria: Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mundipharma, HUYA Bioscience International, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Fujifilm, CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Celgene, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Eisai, Chugai Pharma Koji KatoHonoraria: Takeda, MSD, Kyowa-Kirin, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Mundi, Dainippon-Sumitomo, Bristol-Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Daiichi SankyoResearch Funding: Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo Myron CzuczmanEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Sarah HerseyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers SquibbOther Relationship: Bristol-Myers Squibb Adrian KilcoyneEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Jacqueline RussoEmployment: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite Pharma Krista HudakEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb, NovartisStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis Jingshan ZhangEmployment: Celgene, Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Steve WadeEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Thomas E. WitzigConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Abbvie/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Incyte, Epizyme, Cellectar, Tessa Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am co-inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and pending on the combination of CRM1 inhibitors with salicylates. Please note—simply filed—not even close to being granted. Umberto VitoloConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Abbvie, Roche, Janssen OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, RocheNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
R2-CHOP and placebo/R-CHOP CONSORT diagram (flow of patients from screening to analysis). aMain reasons for failing eligibility criteria: 8% inadequate lymph node or biopsy specimen available, 5% not Ann Arbor stage II-IV, 4% not International Prognostic Index ≥ 2, and 3% unable to adhere to protocol requirements. bTwo R2-CHOP and one placebo/R-CHOP patients were randomly assigned, but never received lenalidomide/placebo or R-CHOP. ABC, activated B-cell-like; ITT, intention to treat; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
PFS, EFS, and OS in the intent-to-treat population: (A) progression-free survival by Independent Radiology Adjudication Committee (IRAC) assessment; (B) event-free survival by IRAC assessment; (C) OS. EFS, event-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
PFS based on IPI status (A) IPI = 2 and (B) IPI ≥ 3 (intent-to-treat population). HR, hazard ratio; IPI, International Prognostic Index; PFS, progression-free survival; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival by Independent Radiology Adjudication Committee in the intent-to-treat population treated with R2-CHOP versus placebo/R-CHOP. aPrespecified stratification factor. CrCl, creatinine clearance; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; IPI, International Prognostic Index; R-CHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
ROBUST study design (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02285062; EudraCT 2013-004054-21). Following confirmation of CD20 positivity and identification of ABC-type by gene expression profiling, patients were stratified by IPI score, bulky disease, and age, and randomly assigned 1:1 to R2-CHOP or placebo/R-CHOP. Patients with non–ABC-type DLBCL were ineligible for the study. Treatment included the following: lenalidomide (or placebo) 15 mg oral (PO) on days 1-14 of every 21-day dosing cycle plus R-CHOP21 (rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] day −1 or 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2.0 mg total] IV day 1, and prednisone [or prednisolone] 100 mg PO days 1-5 [IV day 1 was acceptable]). Treatment was continued until six cycles were complete, or until intolerability, inadequate response, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. Two additional doses of single-agent rituximab (one dose per 21-day cycle) were permitted if prespecified and considered standard of care per local practice. ABC, activated B-cell-like; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; IPI, International Prognostic Index; IV, intravenous; PO, oral; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Overall survival based on treatment group and age < 60 years (A) and ≥ 60 years (B) (ITT population). R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; R2-CHOP, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP.

Comment in

References

    1. Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD: New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classification project. J Clin Oncol 16:2780-2795, 1998 - PubMed
    1. Swerdlow SH Campo E Harris NL, et al. : WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2008
    1. Coiffier B Lepage E Briere J, et al. : CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235-242, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Habermann TM Weller EA Morrison VA, et al. : Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3121-3127, 2006 - PubMed
    1. Tilly H Gomes da Silva M Vitolo U, et al. : Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26:v116-v125, 2015. (suppl 5) - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data