Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33622575
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.030
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative morbidity after anterior resection with diverting loop ileostomy (LI) versus colostomy (LC) and its reversal for rectal cancer. The studies on the application of loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy in anterior resection published from January 2000 to January 2020 were searched in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinical trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included according to inclusion criteria. Eight studies (2 RCTs and 6 cohort studies) totaling 1451 patients (821 LI and 630 LC) were included in the meta-analysis. The morbidity related to stoma formation and closure did not demonstrate significant differences. Significantly more LCs were complicated by stoma prolapse & retraction (OR:0.26,95%CI:0.11-0.60,P = 0.001), parastomal hernia (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01), surgical site infection (SSI) (OR = 0.24,95%CI:0.11-0.49,P < 0.0001) and incisional hernias (OR = 0.39,95%CI:0.19-0.83,P = 0.01) than by LIs. Patients with LI demonstrated significantly more complications related to the stoma, such as dehydration (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01) and ileus (OR = 2.23,95%CI:1.12-4.43, P = 0.02) than patients with LC. While after the subgroup analysis of different publication years, LI could reduce the risk of the morbidity after stoma formation in previous years group (P = 0.04) with a lower heterogeneity (I2 = 37%); LC could reduce the incidence of parastomal dermatitis in recent years group (P < 0.0001) without heterogeneity in each subgroup (I2 = 0%). Cumulative meta-analysis detected significant turning points in dehydration, SSI, and ileus. This meta-analysis recommends diverting LI in the anterior resection for rectal cancer, but there is a risk of dehydration, irritant dermatitis, and ileus.
Keywords: Anterior resection; Loop colostomy; Loop ileostomy; Meta-analysis; Postoperative morbidity; Rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):129-139. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01758-1. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019. PMID: 30747281
-
Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 May 8;39(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04639-2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024. PMID: 38714581 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis.Surg Today. 2019 Feb;49(2):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1708-x. Epub 2018 Aug 27. Surg Today. 2019. PMID: 30151626
-
Meta-analysis of elective surgical complications related to defunctioning loop ileostomy compared with loop colostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Oct;97(7):494-501. doi: 10.1308/003588415X14181254789240. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015. PMID: 26274752 Free PMC article.
-
Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Dec;405(8):1147-1153. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01940-w. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020. PMID: 32705343
Cited by
-
Development of a Clinical Framework-Anastomotic Leakage Prediction Score (CF-ALPS) After Colorectal Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;15(4):455. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040455. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002606 Free PMC article.
-
Propensity score-matched analysis of risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus after TME in rectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 23;29(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03163-x. Tech Coloproctol. 2025. PMID: 40410598 Free PMC article.
-
Ghost Ileostomy Versus Loop Ileostomy Following Oncologic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Surg Innov. 2023 Aug;30(4):501-516. doi: 10.1177/15533506231169066. Epub 2023 Apr 4. Surg Innov. 2023. PMID: 37013791 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for loop colostomy: a propensity-score-matched analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1319-1326. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02856-5. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Tech Coloproctol. 2023. PMID: 37725263
-
Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221118983. doi: 10.1177/15330338221118983. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022. PMID: 36172641 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical