Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):1235-1245.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.12374.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Rectal Cancer: Patient Decision-making, Postoperative Experience and Quality of Life

Affiliations

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Rectal Cancer: Patient Decision-making, Postoperative Experience and Quality of Life

Alexandra Koreli et al. In Vivo. 2021 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Background/aim: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is a form of minimally invasive surgery for selected rectal cancers. The aim of this study was to explore the factors affecting patients' decision-making concerning the choice of surgical treatment as well as to measure the Quality of Life (QoL) post-TEMS.

Patients and methods: Thirty-four patients with rectal cancer stage T1/T2-N0-M0 that underwent TEMS were studied. The questionnaires used included the Short Form SF12v2, Wexner Score (CCF-FIS) and the Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ). The patients' views on experience and treatment decision were obtained with a custom-designed questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed at a mean of 6.9 years following treatment.

Results: The factors that influenced the patients' decisions were: experience satisfaction (p=0.003), postoperative bowel function (p<0.001), lower incontinence score (p=0.020) and agreement of TEMS experience with preoperative information (p=0.049). Treatment experience satisfaction was associated with family support (p=0.034) and agreement with preoperative information (p=0.047), better bowel function (p=0.026) and mental QoL (MCS) (p=0.003).

Conclusion: factors important to patients when reflecting on treatment experience are adequate and reliable information, a good QoL and the presence of family support. Clinicians should incorporate those parameters in their practice when assisting patients in making a surgical treatment choice and provide informed consent on TEMS for rectal cancer.

Keywords: Decision-making; QoL; TEMS; geriatric; incontinence; rectal cancer; sexual functioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Process of data collection.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Factors reflecting on decision satisfaction and their interrelations with treatment experience and QoL. Decision: “Would you have the TEMS surgery again in a similar situation?” Agreement Experience and Info: “Was your experience after TEMS in accordance with what was told to you beforehand?” Family support: “Did you feel you had the chance and enough time to digest the information and discuss with your family?” TEMS Experience: “Would you rate your experience from TEMS surgery as positive or negative on a scale of 0-10?”

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK. Bowel cancer incidence statistics. Cancer Research UK, 2015 . Available at: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s... [Last accessed on 9th December 2020]
    1. Cancer Research UK Survival | Bowel cancer | Cancer Research UK . Available at:https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/aboutcancer/bowel-cancer/survival [Last accessed on 22nd August 2020]
    1. Frattini M, Balestra D, Suardi S, Oggionni M, Alberici P, Radice P, Costa A, Daidone MG, leo E, Pilotti S, Bertario L, Pierotti MA. Different genetic features associated with colon and rectal carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(12):4015–4021. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Cederquist L, Chen Y-J, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, Cooper HS, Deming D, Engstrom PF, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hoffe S, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Meyerhardt J, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Wuthrick E, Gregory KM, Gurski L, Freedman-Cass DA. Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(7):874–901. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources