Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;18(4):197-208.
doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00432-w. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance

Affiliations
Review

Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance

James L Liu et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Early identification and management of prostate cancer completely changed with the discovery of prostate-specific antigen. However, improved detection has also led to overdiagnosis and consequently overtreatment of patients with low-risk disease. Strategies for the management of patients using active surveillance - the monitoring of clinically insignificant disease until intervention is warranted - were developed in response to this issue. The success of this approach is critically dependent on the accurate selection of patients who are predicted to be at the lowest risk of prostate cancer mortality. The Epstein criteria for clinically insignificant prostate cancer were first published in 1994 and have been repeatedly validated for risk-stratification and selection for active surveillance over the past few decades. Current active surveillance programmes use modified criteria with 30-50% of patients receiving treatment at 10 years. Nonetheless, tools for prostate cancer diagnosis have continued to evolve with improvements in biopsy format and targeting, advances in imaging technologies such as multiparametric MRI, and the identification of serum-, tissue- and urine-based biomarkers. These advances have the potential to further improve the identification of men with low-risk disease who can be appropriately managed using active surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bastian, P. J. et al. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications. Eur. Urol. 55, 1321–1330 (2009). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Loeb, S. et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 65, 1046–1055 (2014). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Mahal, B. A. et al. Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010–2015. JAMA 321, 704–706 (2019). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Matoso, A. & Epstein, J. I. Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings. Histopathology 74, 135–145 (2019). - PubMed - DOI
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for prostate cancer V.3.2020 (NCCN, 2020).

Substances

LinkOut - more resources