Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct-Dec;45(4):526-530.
doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_46_20. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

Effect of Interactive Lectures and Formative Assessment on Learning of Epidemiology by Medical Undergraduates - A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Vinayagamoorthy Venugopal  1 , Amol R Dongre  1
Affiliations

Effect of Interactive Lectures and Formative Assessment on Learning of Epidemiology by Medical Undergraduates - A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Vinayagamoorthy Venugopal et al. Indian J Community Med. 2020 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Previously, we had a course in epidemiology for medical undergraduates that was based on traditional lecture methods with no formal formative assessment (FA). We found poor uptake of our course in terms of learning and attendance by students.

Objective: The objective was to assess the effect of improved course (interactive lectures and formal FA) in epidemiology on student learning and attendance.

Materials and methods: It was a triangulation type of mixed-methods program evaluation, where both quantitative (quasi-experimental design) and qualitative (open-ended responses) analysis was done. This study was carried out in the department of community medicine in a tertiary care teaching hospital, Puducherry. We improved the quality of the course material, interaction in lectures and included formal structured FA in the last course. Kirkpatrick's framework was used for the course evaluation. We compared the performance of three batches to check the effect of our revisions on students' learning and their attendance.

Results: Student's learning outcome was measured using end-of-course assessment scores (Level-2). The percentage of students successfully completing the course improved from 39% to 81% and attendance status of ≥90% improved from 50% to 57%. Learner's immediate reactions (Level-1) were captured using open-ended questions, and content analysis was done. Students appreciated the course material, FAs, and in-class activity.

Conclusions: Little improvement in a traditional epidemiology course for undergraduates in the form of interactive lectures and formative feedback and providing the student with course material led to significant gains in students' knowledge and attendance.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Kirkpatrick's evaluation; feedback; formative assessment; interactive lecture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview and timeline of the educational project
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ernster VL. On the teaching of epidemiology to medical students. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:617–8. - PubMed
    1. Novick LF, Greene C, Vogt RL. Teaching medical students epidemiology: Utilizing a state health department. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:401–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khapre M, Gupta M, Kishore S. Experiential Learning in Epidemiology for Medical Undergraduates: A Mixed-Method Approach. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13:7–12.
    1. Kaur G. Study and analysis of lecture model of teaching. Int J Educ Plann Adm. 2011;1:9–13.
    1. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000. [Last accessed on 2019 Aug 01]. Available from: https://wwwnapedu/read/10067/chapter/7 .