Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;17(8):1-8.
doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i8.4126. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

Effect of Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Onlay Restorations on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars

Haleh Kazemi Yazdi  1 , Niusha Sohrabi  2 , Shahbaz Nasser Mostofi  3
Affiliations

Effect of Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Onlay Restorations on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars

Haleh Kazemi Yazdi et al. Front Dent. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Fracture of endodontically treated restored teeth is a common concern. Premolars are subjected to high shear and tensile forces. This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect onlay restorations.

Materials and methods: In this in-vitro experimental study, 45 human maxillary premolars were divided into three groups (n=15) of control (sound teeth), direct onlay, and indirect onlay. In groups 2 and 3, the teeth underwent endodontic treatment. Mesio-occluso-distal cavities were prepared and restored with direct composite (P60) and indirect IPS e.max ceramic onlays, respectively. The teeth were subjected to vertical forces after cyclic loading. The maximum load causing fracture was recorded in Newtons. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, chi-square test, and Tukey's test.

Results: The highest and the lowest fracture resistances were noted in sound teeth and direct onlay restorations, respectively. The difference in fracture resistance was significant among the three groups (P<0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference in the fracture resistance of sound teeth and the two restoration groups (P<0.001). However, the difference in the fracture resistance of direct and indirect onlay restorations was not significant (P=0.6). Chi-square test showed a significantly higher frequency of irreparable fractures in the indirect onlay group (P=0.005).

Conclusion: Direct and indirect onlay restorations were not significantly different in terms of the fracture resistance but the frequency of irreparable fractures was higher in indirect restorations.

Keywords: Ceramics; Composite Resins; Dental Onlay; Endodontically-Treated Teeth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT None declared

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Tooth preparation
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Schematic (A) and actual (B) reparable mode of failure
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Schematic (A) and actual (B) irreparable mode of failure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kazemi Yazdi H, Aryan N, Shahbazi moghadam M. A comparison of the effect of three direct composite restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2014;11(4):199–208.
    1. Alshiddi IF, Aljinbaz A. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations - An in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2016. Jan;28(1):49–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2009. Oct;12(4):154–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarabi N, Taji H, Jalayer J, Ghaffari N, Forghani M. Fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated premolars restored with different adhesive restorations. J Dent Mater Tech. 2015. Mar;4(1):13–20.
    1. Mynampati P, Babu MR, Saraswathi DD, Kumar JR, Gudugunta L, Gaddam D. Comparison of fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with different esthetic onlay systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015. Mar–Apr;18(2):140–3. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources