Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 13;28(12):1402-1408.
doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa003.

Estimation of LDL cholesterol in chronic kidney disease

Affiliations

Estimation of LDL cholesterol in chronic kidney disease

Frederic Bauer et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. .

Abstract

Aims: Most of the laboratories make use of the Friedewald formula to assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The accuracy of this approach, however, crucially depends on triglyceride concentrations. Since hypertriglyceridaemia is a characteristic trait of the lipid profile in chronic kidney disease (CKD), the present study examines the accuracy of the Friedewald formula in this population. It aims to derive and validate a more accurate equation for CKD.

Methods: Cross-sectional study on two cohorts of subjects (overall n = 3.514) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min comparing directly measured LDL-C (LDL-Cmeas) as assessed by an enzymatic assay (Roche, Switzerland) to concentrations estimated by the Friedewald (LDL-CF) and the Martin's formula (LDL-CM). Accuracy was analysed by Bland-Altman and linear regression analyses. In the first cohort, a novel formula was derived to assess LDL-C in CKD. The formula was validated in Cohort 2.

Results: Cohort 1 comprised 1738 subjects, and Cohort 2 comprised 1776 subjects. The mean eGFR was 29.4 ± 14.4 mL/min. In Cohort 1, LDL-CF was highly correlated with LDL-Cmeas (R2 = 0.92) but significantly underestimated LDLmeas by 11 mg/dL. LDL-C = cholesterol - HDL - triglycerides/7.98 was derived as the optimal equation for the calculation of LDL-C in Cohort 1 and was successfully validated in Cohort 2 (bias of 1.6 mg/dL). The novel formula had a higher accuracy than both the Friedewald (bias -12.2 mg/dL) and the Martin's formula (bias -4.8 mg/dL).

Conclusion: The Friedewald formula yields lower LDL-C concentrations in CKD than direct enzymatic measurements, which may lead to undersupply of this cardiovascular high-risk population in a treat-to-target approach.

Keywords: Cardiac risk factors and prevention; Coronary artery disease; Lipoproteins and hyperlipidaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in