Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):244-252.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa248.

The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations

Gianfranco Damiani  1   2 , Domenico Pascucci  1   2 , Alessandro Sindoni  3 , Rosario Mete  4 , Walter Ricciardi  1   2 , Paolo Villari  3 , Corrado De Vito  3
Affiliations

The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations

Gianfranco Damiani et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Primary care services are the first point of contact in a healthcare system; in the last years, many mergers and reconfigurations have taken place in this setting. The aim of this study is to summarize the literature evidence on the relationship between the increase in the size of these organizations and their performance.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out querying EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases, from their inception to January 2020. Articles which quantitatively assessed outcomes and process indicators of merger/structural reorganization of primary care organizations and qualitative articles that assessed staff perception and satisfaction were included in the review.

Results: A total of 3626 articles was identified and another study was retrieved through snowball search; 11 studies were included in the systematic review. Studies about lipid profile evaluation and emergency admissions for chronic conditions showed moderate evidence in supporting the merging of primary care organizations; conversely, clinical outcome studies did not reach a sufficient level of evidence to support merging actions. A moderate evidence of a negative effect on patient's perspective was found.

Conclusion: Actually, there is no strong evidence in favour or against merging of primary care organizations without equivocation. This review supports the possibility to identify indicators for evaluating a merging process of primary care organizations and for adopting eventual remedies during this process. Further efforts should be made to identify additional indicators to assess merge actions among primary care organizations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the review process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Newell F. Framework for patient and public participation in primary care commissioning. NHS England, 2016. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/201... (15 April 2020, date last accessed).
    1. Yin X, Shanley M.. Industry determinants of the “merger versus alliance” decision. Acad Manage Review 2008;33:473–91.
    1. Hagedoorn J, Duysters G.. External sources of innovative capabilities: the preference for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. J Manage Stud 2002;39:167–88.
    1. Starkweather DB. Health facility mergers: some conceptualizations. Med Care 1971;9:468–78. - PubMed
    1. Heeringa J, Mutti A, Furukawa MF, et al.Horizontal and vertical integration of health care providers: a framework for understanding various provider organizational structures. Int J Integr Care 2020;20:2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types