Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Feb;51(1):5-7.
doi: 10.1111/sltb.12664.

Editorial overview: Analytic and methodological innovations for suicide-focused research

Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial overview: Analytic and methodological innovations for suicide-focused research

Brian W Bauer et al. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

This editorial overview provides an introduction to the Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviors Special Issue: "Analytic and Methodological Innovations for Suicide-Focused Research." We outline several challenges faced by modern suicidologists, such as the need to integrate different analytical and methodological techniques from other fields with the unique data problems in suicide research. Therefore, the overall aim of this issue was to provide up-to-date methodological and analytical guidelines, recommendations, and considerations when conducting suicide-focused research. The articles herein present this information in an accessible way for researchers/clinicians and do not require a comprehensive background in quantitative methods. We introduce the topics covered in this special issue, which include how to conduct power analyses using simulations, work with large data sets, use experimental therapeutics, and choose covariates, as well as open science considerations, decision-making models, ordinal regression, machine learning, network analysis, and measurement considerations. Many of the topics covered in this issue provide step-by-step walkthroughs using worked examples with the accompanied code in free statistical programs (i.e., R). It is our hope that these articles provide suicidologists with valuable information and strategies that can help overcome some of the past limitations of suicide research, and improve the methodological rigor of our field.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Cheng, Q., Li, T. M., Kwok, C. L., Zhu, T., & Yip, P. S. (2017). Assessing suicide risk and emotional distress in Chinese social media: A text mining and machine learning study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(7), e243. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7276
    1. Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., … Michaels, M. S. (2017). The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123
    1. Dombrovski, A. Y., & Hallquist, M. N. (2017). The decision neuroscience perspective on suicidal behavior: Evidence and hypotheses. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 30(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000297
    1. Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Huang, X., … Nock, M. K. (2017). Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000084
    1. Hawton, K., Witt, K. G., Taylor Salisbury, T. L., Arensman, E., Gunnell, D., Hazell, P., … van Heeringen, K. (2015). Pharmacological interventions for self-harm in adults. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (7) CD011777. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011777

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources