Structured MRI reporting increases completeness of radiological reports and requesting physicians' satisfaction in the diagnostic workup for pelvic endometriosis
- PMID: 33625575
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-02966-4
Structured MRI reporting increases completeness of radiological reports and requesting physicians' satisfaction in the diagnostic workup for pelvic endometriosis
Abstract
Purpose: MRI plays an important role in the diagnosis and surgical planning of pelvic endometriosis (PE), and imaging reports should contain all relevant information (completeness). As structured reports are being increasingly utilized, we aimed to evaluate whether structured MRI reporting increases the quality of reports regarding completeness and, consequently, their perceived value by gynecologists, in comparison to free-text reports. We also aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of both formats.
Methods: We retrospectively included 28 consecutive women with histologically proven PE who underwent MRI within one month before surgery. Two abdominal radiologists (Rd1/Rd2, 3y/12y experience), blinded to clinical and surgical data, individually elaborated free-text reports and, four months later, structured reports. Completeness (defined as description of six key anatomical sites deemed essential for surgical planning in a consensus of four-blinded external experts) and diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) by site (histology as reference) were compared between reports using the McNemar test. The satisfaction of gynecologists was compared using the marginal homogeneity test.
Results: Structured reporting increased completeness for both Rd1 (rectosigmoid, retrocervical/uterosacral ligament, vagina, and ureter) and Rd2 (vagina, ureter, and bladder) (p < 0.05), without compromising sensitivity or specificity at any of the evaluated sites. Gynecologists' satisfaction was superior with structured reports in most comparisons.
Conclusion: Structured MRI reports perform better in fully documenting essential features of PE and are similar in terms of diagnostic performance, therefore having higher potential for surgical planning. Gynecologists found them easier to assess and were more satisfied with the information provided by structured reports.
Keywords: Diagnostic performance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvic endometriosis; Quality; Structured report.
References
-
- Abrao MS, Gonçalves MO, Dias JA Jr, Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R (2007). Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 22:3092-3097. - DOI
-
- Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha TM, Guerra A, et al (2017). European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 27:2765-2775. - DOI
-
- Coutinho A, Bittencourt LK, Pires CE, Junqueira F, Lima CMA de O, Coutinho E, et al (2011). MR imaging in deep pelvic endometriosis: A pictorial essay. Radiographics 231:549-567.
-
- Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Ricar-do Mendes AP, Warmbrand G, Serafini PC (2011). Findings of pelvic endo-metriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiographics 31:E77-100. - DOI
-
- Alborzi S, Rasekhi A, Shomali Z, Madadi G, Alborzi M, Kazemi M, Hosseini Nohandani A (2018). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal, and transrectal ultrasonography in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Medicine 97:e9536. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials