A Biomechanical Study of Flanged Intrascleral Haptic Fixation of Three-Piece Intraocular Lenses
- PMID: 33626366
- PMCID: PMC10479968
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.021
A Biomechanical Study of Flanged Intrascleral Haptic Fixation of Three-Piece Intraocular Lenses
Abstract
Purpose: Flanged intrascleral haptic fixation (FISHF) is a useful method for securing intraocular lenses (IOLs) in eyes without capsular support. Biomechanical studies were conducted to support the use of this technique.
Design: Laboratory investigation.
Methods: Haptics of 3-piece IOLs were passed through cadaveric human sclera using 30- and 27-gauge needles. Flanges were created by melting 1.0 mm from the haptic ends using cautery. The forces required to remove the flanged haptic from the sclera and disinsert the haptic from the optic were measured using a mechanical tester and a custom-fabricated mount.
Results: The mean FISHF dislocation force using 30-gauge needles was greatest with the CT Lucia 602 (2.04 ± 0.24 newtons [N]) compared to the LI61AO (0.93 ± 0.41 N; P = .001), ZA9003 (0.70 ± 0.34 N; P = <.001), and MA60AC (0.27 ± 0.19 N; P <.001). Using 27-gauge needles with the CT Lucia resulted in a lower dislocation force (0.56 ± 0.36 N; P <.001). The FISHF dislocation force was correlated with the flange-to-needle diameter ratio (r = 0.975). The FISHF dislocation forces of the CT Lucia and LI61AO using 30-gauge needles were not significantly different from their haptic-optic disinsertion forces (P = .79 and .27, respectively). There were no differences in flange diameters between 1.0 mm and 2.0 mm haptic melt lengths across the IOLs (P = .15-.85).
Conclusions: These data strongly support the biomechanical stability of FISHF with the polyvinylidene fluoride haptics of the CT Lucia using small diameter instruments for the creation of an intrascleral tunnel. 1.0 mm of haptic may be the optimal melt length.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
ALL AUTHORS HAVE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED THE ICMJE FORM FOR DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST and none were reported.
Figures




References
-
- Evereklioglu C, Er H, Bekir NA, Borazan M, Zorlu F. Comparison of secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber and scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(2):301–308. - PubMed
-
- Vote BJ, Tranos P, Bunce C, Charteris DG, Da Cruz L. Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(2):308–312. - PubMed
-
- McAllister AS, Hirst LW. Visual outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(7):1263–1269. - PubMed
-
- Wasiluk E, Krasnicki P, Dmuchowska DA, Proniewska-Skręt ek E, Mariak Z. The implantation of the scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens with 9/0 polypropylene sutures: long-term visual outcomes and complications. Adv Med Sci. 2019;64(1):100–103. - PubMed
-
- Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, Jacobs DS. Karp CL on behalf of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(4):840–859. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources