Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 9:2021:8214052.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8214052. eCollection 2021.

Acupuncture at Back-Shu and Front-Mu Acupoints Prevents Gastric Ulcer by Regulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF- κ B Signaling Pathway

Affiliations

Acupuncture at Back-Shu and Front-Mu Acupoints Prevents Gastric Ulcer by Regulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF- κ B Signaling Pathway

Li Li et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the preventive effects of acupuncture at back-shu and front-mu acupoints on rats with restraint water-immersion stress (RWIS)-induced gastric ulcer.

Methods: Thirty-six rats were randomly divided into four groups for 10 days of treatment as follows: the normal group received no treatment; the model group received RWIS-induced gastric ulcer; the omeprazole group was administered omeprazole orally every 2 days; and the electroacupuncture group received electroacupuncture at the RN12 and BL21 acupoints every 2 days. After 10 days of treatment, except for the normal group, all rats were induced with gastric ulcer by RWIS for 3 h. The ulcer index (UI), ulcer inhibition rate, and histopathological score were calculated. We determined the levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 in serum, and the activities of myeloperoxidase (MPO), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), nitric oxide (NO), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in serum and gastric tissues. Protein expression of MyD88, nuclear factor (NF)-κB (p65), and toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 was quantified in gastric tissues.

Results: The electroacupuncture and omeprazole groups were equivalent in terms of UI, ulcer inhibition rate, and histopathological score. The serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were significantly lower in the electroacupuncture group compared with the omeprazole group (P < 0.05). Compared with the model group, there were significant changes in the levels of NO, MPO, GSH-Px, and MDA in all other groups, while the expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB p65 in gastric tissue decreased significantly in the electroacupuncture group. The expression of TLR4 was substantially lower in the electroacupuncture group compared with the omeprazole group.

Conclusion: Acupuncture at back-shu and front-mu acupoints played a role in preventing gastric ulcer by inhibiting extracellular signals, stimulating kinases in serum and gastric tissues, and activating the inhibition of the TLR4 signaling pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The location of the RN12 and BL21 acupoints in the rat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Macroscopic images of representative gastric tissues from each treatment group. (a) Normal. (b) Model. (c) Omeprazole. (d) Electroacupuncture.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative histopathological photos of gastric tissue sections from each group. (a) Normal. (b) Model. (c) Omeprazole. (d) Electroacupuncture.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histopathological lesion scores in each group. aModel group compared with the normal group (P < 0.05); bomeprazole group compared with the model group (P < 0.05); celectroacupuncture group compared with the model group (P < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Levels of five oxidative stress indicators in serum (left panels) and gastric tissue (right panels) in each group. aModel group compared with the normal group (P < 0.05); bomeprazole group compared with the model group (P < 0.05); celectroacupuncture group compared with the model group (P < 0.05); delectroacupuncture group compared with the omeprazole group (P < 0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The expression of two inflammatory factors in serum in each group. aModel group compared with the normal group (P < 0.05); bomeprazole group compared with the model group (P < 0.05); celectroacupuncture group compared with the model group (P < 0.05); delectroacupuncture group compared with the omeprazole group (P < 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Western blotting showing representative bands of three members of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway in each group. Nor: normal group; Mod: model group; OMZ: omeprazole group; EA: electroacupuncture group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afzal M., Gupta G., Kazmi I., et al. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic potential of a novel steroidal derivative from Bryophyllum pinnatum. Fitoterapia. 2012;83(5):853–858. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uramoto H., Ohno T., Ishihara T. Gastric mucosal protection induced by restraint and water-immersion stress in rats. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology. 1990;54(3):287–298. doi: 10.1254/jjp.54.287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bardou M., Quenot J.-P., Barkun A. Stress-related mucosal disease in the critically ill patient. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2015;12(2):98–107. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.235. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monnig A. A., Prittie J. E. A review of stress-related mucosal disease. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 2011;21(5):484–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00680.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spirt M. J. Stress-related mucosal disease: risk factors and prophylactic therapy. Clinical Therapeutics. 2004;26(2):197–213. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90019-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources