Discrepancy rates of preliminary and final reports for after-hours pediatric teleradiology interpretations
- PMID: 33628460
- PMCID: PMC7883166
- DOI: 10.1177/2058460121989319
Discrepancy rates of preliminary and final reports for after-hours pediatric teleradiology interpretations
Abstract
Background: Children's hospitals often do not have a high enough volume to justify providing radiologist staffing overnight, leading to hospitals employing teleradiology services to offer preliminary reports. There is limited literature related to discrepancies between preliminary teleradiology pediatric radiologists and final interpretations.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine discrepancy rates for teleradiologists preliminarily interpreting pediatric exams at a children's hospital.
Material and methods: Eight thousand seven hundred seventy-eight consecutive preliminary reports issued by pediatric teleradiologists were reviewed. The hospital utilized a system in which local onsite radiologists rated the preliminary reports of teleradiologists following the interpretations as part of standard operating procedure. Discrepancies were also rated according to whether the discrepancy was actionable (judged to alter patient management by the final rater) or not. Rates were stratified by modality, preliminary teleradiologist reader, and final rater and compared to each using a normal approximation. The mean discrepancy rates were compared using a z test for proportions. Linear regression was applied to the effect of years of radiologist experience on the total and actionable discrepancy rates.
Results: The overall actionable discrepancy rate was 1.6%, similar to inter-observer discrepancy rates reported in other studies. There were no significant differences in the actionable discrepancy rates among teleradiologists. There was no correlation between years of experience and discrepancy rate for either the teleradiologists or the final raters.
Conclusion: Pediatric subspecialty teleradiologists issue reports that mirror discrepancy rates typical of radiologists who issue reports for emergent adult studies. Years of radiologist experience is not a predictor of discrepancy rate.
Keywords: Residents; discrepancies; on call; pediatrics; performance; teleradiology.
© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Hammer MM, Shetty AS, Cizman Z, et al. Results of the 2015 survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology. Acad Radiol 2015; 22:1308–1316. - PubMed
-
- Bruno MA, Duncan JR, Bierhals AJ, et al. Overnight resident versus 24-hour attending radiologist coverage in academic medical centers. Radiology 2018; 289:809–813. - PubMed
-
- Weinberg BD, Richter MD, Champine JG, et al. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12:95–100. - PubMed
-
- Branstetter BF, Morgan MB, Nesbit CE, et al. Preliminary reports in the emergency department: is a subspecialist radiologist more accurate than a radiology resident? Acad Radiol 2007; 14:201–206. - PubMed
-
- Pfeifer CM. Declining interest in pediatric radiology prompts a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:490–492. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous