Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Feb 4:2021:8836395.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8836395. eCollection 2021.

Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020

Huifang Xia et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify and evaluate characteristics of the most influential articles in achalasia research during the period 1995-2020.

Methods: Articles in Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), and PubMed were scanned from 1995 to 2020 with achalasia as the keyword. We retrieved the articles that met all criteria by descending order after using EndNote to remove the duplicated references. Our bibliometric analysis highlighted publication year, country, journals, and networks of keywords.

Results: Fifteen percent of the top 100 most-cited articles were published in Annals of Surgery. They were performed in 15 countries, and most (n = 55) were from the USA. The number of citations of the 482 articles ranged from 30 to 953, 38 of which had been published in American Journal of Gastroenterology. Those articles were from 31 countries, and most of the studies (n = 217) had been performed in the USA. Most of articles (n = 335) were clinical research. Treatments were hotspots in the field of achalasia in the past years. The most influential title words were "achalasia," "esophagomyotomy," "pneumatic dilation," and "lower esophageal sphincter."

Conclusion: Our study offers a historical perspective on the progress of achalasia research and identified the most significant evolution in this field. Results showed treatment was the most influence aspect in achalasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The percentage of articles about treatment in each year.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of top-100 cited articles per year.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of the 482 articles per year.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Network plot of influential keywords with five or more times in achalasia research among the 482 articles of Web of Science Core Collection: (a) overlay visualization and (b) density visualization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finch J., Bell S., Bellingan L., et al. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Executive summary. International Microbiology. 2013;16(2):125–132. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gyawali C. P. Achalasia: new perspectives on an old disease. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 2016;28(1):4–11. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12750. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verlaan T., Rohof W. O., Bredenoord A. J., Eberl S., Rösch T., Fockens P. Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophagogastric junction physiology in patients with achalasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013;78(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616. - DOI
    1. Tricco A. C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources