Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;106(4):560-567.
doi: 10.1007/s00128-021-03137-3. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Kinetics and Mechanisms of Virus Inactivation by Chlorine Dioxide in Water Treatment: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Kinetics and Mechanisms of Virus Inactivation by Chlorine Dioxide in Water Treatment: A Review

Yuexian Ge et al. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Chlorine dioxide (ClO2), an alternative disinfectant to chlorine, has been widely applied in water and wastewater disinfection. This paper aims at presenting an overview of the inactivation kinetics and mechanisms of ClO2 with viruses. The inactivation efficiencies vary greatly among different virus species. The inactivation rates for different serotypes within a family of viruses can differ by over 284%. Generally, to achieve a 4-log removal, the exposure doses, also being referred to as Ct values (mutiplying the concentration of ClO2 and contact time) vary in the range of 0.06-10 mg L-1 min. Inactivation kinetics of viruses show two phases: an initial rapid inactivation phase followed by a tailing phase. Inactivation rates of viruses increase as pH or temperature increases, but show different trends with increasing concentrations of dissolved organic matter (DOM). Both damages in viral proteins and in the 5' noncoding region within the genome contribute to virus inactivation upon ClO2 disinfection.

Keywords: Chlorine dioxide (ClO2); Disinfection; Kinetics; Mechanisms; Virus; Water treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The log removal of viruses during ClO2 disinfection. Note: the data of enveloped virus is circled; the line indicates the variations of Ct values to achieve the 4-log removal. The legend with a black edge indicates that Ct value is the product of initial concentration of ClO2 and contact time
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Inactivation mechanisms of viruses by ClO2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alvarez ME, Brien RT. Mechanisms of inactivation of poliovirus by chlorine dioxide and iodine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:1064–1071. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.5.1064-1071.1982. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aquino de Carvalho N, Stachler EN, Cimabue N, Bibby K. Evaluation of Phi6 persistence and suitability as an enveloped virus surrogate. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:8692–8700. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arbely E, Granot Z, Kass I, Orly J, Arkin IT. A trimerizing GxxxG motif is uniquely inserted in the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus spike protein transmembrane domain. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11349–11356. doi: 10.1021/bi060953v. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aronino R, Dlugy C, Arkhangelsky E, Shandalov S, Oron G, Brenner A, Gitis V. Removal of viruses from surface water and secondary effluents by sand filtration. Water Res. 2009;43:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. AWWA Water Quality Division Committee report: disinfection at large and medium-size systems. J Am Water Work Assoc. 2000;92:32–43. doi: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08942.x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources