Intrathecal chloroprocaine or hyperbaric prilocaine for ambulatory knee surgery? A prospective randomized study
- PMID: 33629206
- PMCID: PMC7905001
- DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00332-3
Intrathecal chloroprocaine or hyperbaric prilocaine for ambulatory knee surgery? A prospective randomized study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine with 2% hyperbaric prilocaine in the setting of ambulatory knee arthroscopy. We hypothesized that complete resolution of the sensory block was faster with chloroprocaine.
Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were included in this prospective randomized double-blind study. Spinal anesthesia was performed with either chloroprocaine (50 mg) or hyperbaric prilocaine (50 mg). Characteristics of sensory and motor blocks and side effects were recorded.
Results: Mean time to full sensory block recovery was shorter with chloroprocaine (169 (56.1) min vs 248 (59.4)). The characteristics of the sensory blocks were similar at the T12 dermatome level between the two groups. Differences appeared at T10: the percentage of patients with a sensory block was higher, onset quicker and duration longer with hyperbaric prilocaine. The number of patients with a sensory block at T4 dermatome level in both groups was minimal. Times to full motor recovery were identical in both groups (85 (70-99) vs 86 (76-111) min). Time to spontaneous voiding was shorter with chloroprocaine (203 (57.6) min vs 287.3 (47.2) min). Incidence of side effects was low in both groups.
Conclusions: When considering the characteristics of the sensory block, the use of chloroprocaine may allow an earlier discharge of patients. Cephalic extension was to a higher dermatomal level and the sensory block at T10 level was of prolonged duration with hyperbaric prilocaine, suggesting that the choice between the two drugs should also be performed based on the level of the sensory block requested by the surgery. This study is registered in the US National Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: NCT030389 , the first of February 2017, Retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Chloroprocaine; Hyperbaric prilocaine; Prospective study; Sensory block; Spinal anesthesia.
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicable.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Chloroprocaine versus prilocaine for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Aug 21:rapm-2019-100673. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100673. Online ahead of print. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019. PMID: 31439640
-
Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653. Anesth Analg. 2022. PMID: 34153006 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):568-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e30bb8. Epub 2010 Jun 7. Anesth Analg. 2010. PMID: 20529983 Clinical Trial.
-
Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18. J Clin Anesth. 2019. PMID: 30237085
-
Optimal local anesthetic regimen for saddle block in ambulatory anorectal surgery: an evidence-based systematic review.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Sep;45(9):733-739. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101603. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32699103
Cited by
-
Spinal Anesthesia for Ambulatory Surgery Using Hyperbaric Prilocaine vs Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Prospective Study.Cureus. 2025 Jan 30;17(1):e78246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78246. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40026957 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2024 Dec 1;37(6):661-665. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001412. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38979677 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retrospective comparison of chloroprocaine and mepivacaine in spinal anesthesia for same-day discharge TKA.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025 Aug 7;37(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43019-025-00283-4. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40775385 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory non-arthroplasty surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Can J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;72(4):550-566. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02924-4. Epub 2025 Apr 8. Can J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40199797 English.
References
-
- Zaric D, Pace NL. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD003006. - PubMed
-
- Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer; 2005.
-
- Förster JG, Rosenberg PH, et al. Chloroprocaine 40 mg produces shorter spinal block than articaine 40mg in day-case knee arthroscopy patients. ActaAnesthesiolScand. 2013;57:911–919. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials