Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Dec;53(1):402-409.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1891453.

Performance of prediction models for short-term outcome in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of prediction models for short-term outcome in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study

Paul M E L van Dam et al. Ann Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a high burden on the healthcare system. Prediction models may assist in triaging patients. We aimed to assess the value of several prediction models in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: In this retrospective study, ED patients with COVID-19 were included. Prediction models were selected based on their feasibility. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality, secondary outcomes were 14-day mortality and a composite outcome of 30-day mortality and admission to medium care unit (MCU) or intensive care unit (ICU). The discriminatory performance of the prediction models was assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: We included 403 patients. Thirty-day mortality was 23.6%, 14-day mortality was 19.1%, 66 patients (16.4%) were admitted to ICU, 48 patients (11.9%) to MCU, and 152 patients (37.7%) met the composite endpoint. Eleven prediction models were included. The RISE UP score and 4 C mortality scores showed very good discriminatory performance for 30-day mortality (AUC 0.83 and 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.88 for both), significantly higher than that of the other models.

Conclusion: The RISE UP score and 4 C mortality score can be used to recognise patients at high risk for poor outcome and may assist in guiding decision-making and allocating resources.

Keywords: COVID-19; emergency department; mortality; prediction; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Survival curve and table of the study sample.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC curves for predicting 30-day mortality.

References

    1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O'Neill N, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): situation report - 134 2020. [updated 2 June 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2....
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. ; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 . Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–1720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruggemann R, Gietema H, Jallah B, et al. Arterial and venous thromboembolic disease in a patient with COVID-19: a case report. Thromb Res. 2020;191:153–155. - PMC - PubMed