Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;61(3):1772-1791.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01203-y. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

The Impact of US Nurses' Personal Religious and Spiritual Beliefs on Their Mental Well-Being and Burnout: A Path Analysis

Affiliations

The Impact of US Nurses' Personal Religious and Spiritual Beliefs on Their Mental Well-Being and Burnout: A Path Analysis

Stephanie Harris et al. J Relig Health. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding the impact of nurses' personal religious and spiritual beliefs on their mental well-being and burnout. A model of the association between these factors was tested based on surveys of 207 nurses located in southeastern USA and analyzed to determine the association between religion/spirituality, mental well-being, and burnout. A path analysis supported a model in which, through its positive impact on mental well-being, religion/spirituality was negatively associated with emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and positively associated with personal accomplishment.

Keywords: Burnout; Mental well-being; Nurses; Religion; Spirituality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A model of the association between religion/spirituality, mental well-being, and burnout. The top line consists of theoretical constructs, while the bottom line consists of the indicators for those constructs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Path diagram for initial and revised models including path coefficients. a Initial model, b revised model. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bartels AL, Peterson SJ, Reina CS. Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215957. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckstead JW. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Maslach Burnout Inventory among Florida nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2002;39(8):785–792. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00012-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blegen MA, Spector N, Lynn MR, Barnsteiner J, Ulrich BT. Newly licensed RN retention: Hospital and nurse characteristics. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2017;47(10):508–514. doi: 10.1097/nna.0000000000000523. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2014;12(6):573–576. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browning L, Ryan CS, Thomas S, Greenberg M, Rolniak S. Nursing specialty and burnout. Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(2):248–254. doi: 10.1080/13548500600568290. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources