Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies

Kirstin R W Matthews et al. Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

It now seems technically feasible to culture human embryos beyond the "fourteen-day limit," which has the potential to increase scientific understanding of human development and perhaps improve infertility treatments. The fourteen-day limit was adopted as a compromise but subsequently has been considered an ethical line. Does it remain relevant in light of technological advances permitting embryo maturation beyond it? Should it be changed and, if so, how and why? What justifications would be necessary to expand the limit, particularly given that doing so would violate some people's moral commitments regarding human embryos? Robust stakeholder engagement preceded adoption of the fourteen-day limit and should arguably be part of efforts to reassess it. Such engagement could also consider the need for enhanced oversight of human embryo research. In the meantime, developing and implementing reliable oversight systems should help foster high-quality research and public confidence in it.

Keywords: embryo; fourteen-day limit; guidelines; policy; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Deglincerti A. et al., “Self-Organization of the In Vitro Attached Human Embryo,” Nature 533 (2016): 251–54; M. N. Shahbazi et al., “Self-Organization of the Human Embryo in the Absence of Maternal Tissues,” Nature Cell Biology 18 (2018): 700-708. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (DHEW) Ethics Advisory Board , Report and Conclusions: HEW Support of Research Involving Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office of Printing, 1979); M. Warnock, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1984).
    1. Hurlbut B. J. et al., “Revisiting the Warnock Limit,” Nature Biotechnology 35 (2017): 1029–42; G. Cavaliere, “A 14-Day Limit for Bioethics: The Debate over Human Embryo Research,” BMC Medical Ethics 18 (2017): 38; M. F. Pera, “Human Embryo Research and the 14-Day Limit,” Development 144 (2017): 1923-25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoenwolf G. C. et al., Larson's Human Embryology (Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2015), 144; L. Scott, “The Origin of Monozygotic Twinning,” RBM Online 5 (2002): 276-84. - PubMed
    1. Some reject this claim, holding that destroying embryos involves destroying early human life. For an overview of competing positions on human embryo research, see Khushf G., “Embryo Research: The Ethical Geography of the Debate,” Journal of Medical Philosophy 22 (1997): 495–519. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources