Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-care Tests Used to Detect Arterial Disease in Diabetes: TEsting for Arterial Disease in Diabetes (TrEAD) Study
- PMID: 33630461
 - DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004545
 
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-care Tests Used to Detect Arterial Disease in Diabetes: TEsting for Arterial Disease in Diabetes (TrEAD) Study
Abstract
Objective: We compared the diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care duplex ultrasound test (podiatry ankle duplex scan; PAD-scan) against commonly used bedside tests for the detection of PAD in diabetes.
Background: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated.
Methods: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound.
Results: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%-97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%-50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%-38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%-84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%-93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests.
Conclusions: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 
    
- Carrington AL, Mawdsley SK, Morley M, et al. Psychological status of diabetic people with or without lower limb disability. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996;32:19–25.
 
 - 
    
- Moulik PK, Mtonga R, Gill GV. Amputation and mortality in new-onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:491–494.
 
 - 
    
- Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, et al. Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE study. Diabetologia. 2008;51:747–755.
 
 - 
    
- NHS Digital. National Diabetes Foot Care Audit Fourth Annual Report. 2019; Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nat... . Accessed December 29, 2020.
 
 - 
    
- Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia,;1; infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50:18–25.
 
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
