A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
- PMID: 33630941
- PMCID: PMC7906405
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247466
A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS
Abstract
Background: Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice.
Methods: A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting.
Results: Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the "life impact" domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance.
Conclusion: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS.
Core outcome set registration: This PGP-COS was registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) in January 2017 (http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/958).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0624-5. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 30509216 Free PMC article.
-
Methodology in core outcome set (COS) development: the impact of patient interviews and using a 5-point versus a 9-point Delphi rating scale on core outcome selection in a COS development study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01197-3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 33413129 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes-a study protocol.Trials. 2020 Dec 11;21(1):1017. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04910-1. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33308263 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes and outcomes measurements used in intervention studies of pelvic girdle pain and lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review.Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Nov 5;27:62. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0279-2. eCollection 2019. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019. PMID: 31700607 Free PMC article.
-
A core outcome set for studies of gestational diabetes mellitus prevention and treatment.Diabetologia. 2020 Jun;63(6):1120-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05123-6. Epub 2020 Mar 20. Diabetologia. 2020. PMID: 32193573 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects of a New Mattress and Pillow and Standard Treatment for Nightly Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnant Women: A Randomised Controlled Study.Int J Womens Health. 2021 Dec 16;13:1251-1260. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S335977. eCollection 2021. Int J Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34938126 Free PMC article.
-
One step at a time. Shaping consensus on research priorities and terminology in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain: an international modified e-Delphi study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 3;24(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06866-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37789304 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(26):1-151. doi: 10.3310/MNBY3104. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38943314 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Research on Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain (PPGP) from 2002 to 2022 Using Bibliometrics.J Pain Res. 2024 Feb 13;17:643-666. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S431438. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38371481 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Core Outcome Set for the research and assessment of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 22;18(8):e0289501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289501. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37607197 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kovacs FM, Garcia E, Royuela A, Gonzalez L, Abraira V. Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: a multicenter study conducted in the Spanish National Health Service. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37: 1516–1533. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824dcb74 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gutke A, Lundberg M, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B. Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms. Eur spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2011;20: 440–448. 10.1007/s00586-010-1487-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80: 505–510. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous