The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Vaginal Wet Mount Microscopy Guidelines: How to Perform, Applications, and Interpretation
- PMID: 33631782
- DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000595
The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Vaginal Wet Mount Microscopy Guidelines: How to Perform, Applications, and Interpretation
Abstract
Objectives: The aims of the study were to assess the available literature concerning the indications, performance, technique, and classification of wet mount microscopy (WMM) and to establish evidence-based recommendations.
Methods: Literature review from the main scientific databases was performed by the ad hoc "Vaginitis and Microbiome Committee" of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. The document was approved by the executive council and membership of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease.
Results: Available data are limited and usually of low level of evidence. Nevertheless, it shows that WMM is capable of reducing misdiagnosis, overtreatment, and undertreatment of vaginal conditions. It has an excellent performance for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and variable performance for trichomoniasis and candidiasis. It is the gold standard for aerobic vaginitis/desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. Currently, there is no recommendation to use WMM in the screening of asymptomatic women.The use of phase contrast is recommended to improve performance and reproducibility. Sampling location, devices, and technique have an impact on the results.Available scoring and classification scores have significant limitations.
Conclusions: Wet mount microscopy is a point-of-care, inexpensive, and fast technique that, with practice, can be mastered by office clinicians. It should be considered a basic skill in the curricula of gynecology and obstetrics residencies. Recommendations are provided on sampling, reading, and scoring.
Copyright © 2021, ASCCP.
Conflict of interest statement
P.V.B. was an investigator for Seegene and received speaker fees from Seegene, Merck, Gedeon-Richter, and Roche. The other authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Hillier SL, Austin M, Macio I, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vaginal discharge syndromes in community practice settings. Clin Infect Dis 2020;ciaa260.
-
- Frobenius W, Bogdan C. Diagnostic value of vaginal discharge, wet mount and vaginal pH—an update on the basics of gynecologic infectiology. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015;75:355–66.
-
- Cibley LJ, Cibley LJ. Cytolytic vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165(4 Pt 2):1245–9.
-
- Vieira-Baptista P, Bornstein J. Candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis and other vaginal conditions affecting the vulva. In: Bornstein J, ed. Vulvar Disease: Breaking the Myths . Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019.
-
- Lynch T, Peirano G, Lloyd T, et al. Molecular diagnosis of vaginitis: comparing quantitative PCR and microbiome profiling approaches to current microscopy scoring. J Clin Microbiol 2019;57:e00300–19.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
