Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):193.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07884-8.

Molecular profile of KRAS G12C-mutant colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer

Affiliations

Molecular profile of KRAS G12C-mutant colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer

Luiz Henrique Araujo et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, however efforts to develop targeted therapies have been largely unsuccessful. Recently, two small-molecule inhibitors, AMG 510 and MRTX849, have shown promising activity in KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors. The current study aims to assess the molecular profile of KRAS G12C in colorectal (CRC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tested in a clinical certified laboratory.

Methods: CRC and NSCLC samples submitted for KRAS testing between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. CRC samples were tested for KRAS and NRAS by pyrosequencing, while NSCLC samples were submitted to next generation sequencing of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, and BRAF.

Results: The dataset comprised 4897 CRC and 4686 NSCLC samples. Among CRC samples, KRAS was mutated in 2354 (48.1%). Most frequent codon 12 mutations were G12D in 731 samples (14.9%) and G12V in 522 (10.7%), followed by G12C in 167 (3.4%). KRAS mutations were more frequent in females than males (p = 0.003), however this difference was exclusive of non-G12C mutants (p < 0.001). KRAS mutation frequency was lower in the South and North regions (p = 0.003), but again KRAS G12C did not differ significantly (p = 0.80). In NSCLC, KRAS mutations were found in 1004 samples (21.4%). As opposed to CRC samples, G12C was the most common mutation in KRAS, in 346 cases (7.4%). The frequency of KRAS G12C was higher in the South and Southeast regions (p = 0.012), and lower in patients younger than 50 years (p < 0.001). KRAS G12C mutations were largely mutually exclusive with other driver mutations; only 11 NSCLC (3.2%) and 1 CRC (0.6%) cases had relevant co-mutations.

Conclusions: KRAS G12C presents in frequencies higher than several other driver mutations, and may represent a large volume of patients in absolute numbers. KRAS testing should be considered in all CRC and NSCLC patients, independently of clinical or demographic characteristics.

Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; KRAS; Lung neoplasms; Molecular diagnostics; Molecular targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency of KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutations in colorectal (a) and non-small cell lung cancer (b)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of KRAS codon 12 mutations in colorectal (CRC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency of KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutations according to gender (a), age (b), and geographic region (c) in colorectal cancer
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency of KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutations according to gender (a), age (b), and geographic region (c) in non-small cell lung cancer

References

    1. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, McGreevey LS, Chen CJ, Van den Abbeele AD, Druker BJ, et al. Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(23):4342–4349. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.190. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2129–2139. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040938. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macconaill LE, Garraway LA. Clinical implications of the cancer genome. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5219–5228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4944. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shin SH, Bode AM, Dong Z. Addressing the challenges of applying precision oncology. NPJ precision oncology. 2017;1(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41698-017-0032-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox AD, Der CJ. Ras history: the saga continues. Small GTPases. 2010;1(1):2–27. doi: 10.4161/sgtp.1.1.12178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed