Effect of fluid strategy on stroke volume, cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a sub-study of the Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial
- PMID: 33632521
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.011
Effect of fluid strategy on stroke volume, cardiac output, and fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a sub-study of the Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial
Abstract
Background: We designed a prospective sub-study of the larger Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) trial to measure differences in stroke volume and other haemodynamic parameters at the end of the intraoperative fluid protocols. The haemodynamic effects of the two fluid regimens may increase our understanding of the observed perioperative outcomes.
Methods: Stroke volume and cardiac output were measured with both an oesophageal Doppler ultrasound monitor and arterial pressure waveform analysis. Stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and plethysmographic variability index were also obtained. A passive leg raise manoeuvre was performed to identify fluid responsiveness.
Results: Analysis of 105 patients showed that the primary outcome, Doppler monitor-derived stroke volume index, was higher in the liberal group: restrictive 38.5 (28.6-48.8) vs liberal 44.0 (34.9-61.9) ml m-2; P=0.043. Similarly, there was a higher cardiac index in the liberal group: 2.96 (2.32-4.05) vs 2.42 (1.94-3.26) L min-1 m-2; P=0.015. Arterial-pressure-based stroke volume and cardiac index did not differ, nor was there a significant difference in stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, or plethysmographic variability index. The passive leg raise manoeuvre showed fluid responsiveness in 40% of restrictive and 30% of liberal protocol patients (not significant).
Conclusions: The liberal fluid group from the RELIEF trial had significantly higher Doppler ultrasound monitor-derived stroke volume and cardiac output compared with the restrictive fluid group at the end of the intraoperative period. Measures of fluid responsiveness did not differ significantly between groups.
Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12615000125527.
Keywords: cardiac output; fluid responsiveness; fluid therapy; goal-directed fluid therapy; oesophageal Doppler ultrasound; passive leg raise.
Copyright © 2021 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The effect of restrictive compared to liberal intravenous fluid volume on hypotension in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 22;14(1):14401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65031-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38909131 Free PMC article.
-
A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Nov;42(6):752-60. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200611. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014. PMID: 25342408 Clinical Trial.
-
Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ).Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):374-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes399. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Br J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23171725 Clinical Trial.
-
Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery.Crit Care. 2021 Jun 11;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03629-y. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34116707 Free PMC article.
-
The Vigileo-FloTrac™ system: arterial waveform analysis for measuring cardiac output and predicting fluid responsiveness: a clinical review.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):1361-74. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 Jul 11. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014. PMID: 25027098 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Postoperative hypotension in gastric cancer patients: causes and clinical approaches.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 7;33(9):763. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09834-7. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40775538 Review.
-
Fluid responsiveness and hypotension in patients undergoing propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy following bowel preparation: a prospective cohort study.Can J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;72(4):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02939-x. Epub 2025 Apr 11. Can J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40214865 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy combined with enhanced recovery after surgery program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled study.Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Jul 10;12(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00327-x. Perioper Med (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37430359 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of restrictive compared to liberal intravenous fluid volume on hypotension in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 22;14(1):14401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65031-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38909131 Free PMC article.
-
Post-operative outcomes of intra-operative restrictive and conventional fluid management in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;19(2):239-244. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_19_22. J Minim Access Surg. 2023. PMID: 35915517 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous