Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 1;22(4):237-245.
doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001044.

Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review

Biagio Sassone et al. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). .

Abstract

The current narrative review provides an update of available knowledge on venous access techniques for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, with a focus on axillary vein puncture. Lower procedure-related and lead-related complications have been reported with extrathoracic vein puncture techniques compared with intrathoracic accesses. In particular, extrathoracic lead access through the axillary vein seems to be associated with lower complication incidence than subclavian vein puncture and higher success rate than cephalic vein cutdown. In literature, many techniques have been described for axillary vein access. The use of contrast venography-guided puncture has facilitated the diffusion of the axillary vein approach for device implantation. Venography may be particularly useful in specific demographic and clinical device implantation contexts. Ultrasound-guided or microwire-guided vascular access for lead positioning can be considered a valid alternative to venography, although current applications for axillary vein puncture need further evaluations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lin YS, Hung SP, Chen PR, et al. Risk factors influencing complications of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: infection, pneumothorax and heart perforation: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Medicine 2014; 93:e213.
    1. Aggarwal RK, Connelly DT, Ray SG, Ball J, Charles RG. Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems. Br Heart J 1995; 73:571–575.
    1. Parsonnet V, Bernstein A, Lindsay B. Pacemaker-implantation complication rates: an analysis of some contributing factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13:917–921.
    1. Mobin-Uddin K, Smith P, Lombardo C, Jude J. Percutaneous intracardiac pacing through the subclavian vein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 54:545–548.
    1. Littleford PO, Parsonnet V, Spector SD. Method for the rapid and atraumatic insertion of permanent endocardial pacemaker electrodes through the subclavian vein. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43:980–982.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources