Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4703.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84172-2.

Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the onset time between 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized-controlled trial

Ha-Jung Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

At centers with pressure on rapid operating room turnover, onset time is one of the important considerations for choosing a local anesthetic drug. To hasten the onset of the block, higher concentrations of local anesthetics are sometimes used. However, the use of diluted local anesthetics may be safer. Therefore, we aimed to compare the onset times of equipotential levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentrations for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Adult patients undergoing upper extremity surgery under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block at our center were randomly allocated to the levobupivacaine and ropivacaine groups. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block was induced with 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine depending on the assigned group. The degrees of sensory and motor blockade were assessed for 40 min after the administration of local anesthetics. A total of 46 patients were included in the analysis. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.375% ropivacaine provided sufficient surgical anesthesia. The sensory onset time of 0.375% ropivacaine was shorter than that of 0.25% levobupivacaine (group R, 15 [15.0-22.5] min; group L, 30 [17.5-35.0] min, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other block characteristics and clinical outcomes between the two groups. Thus, when a quicker block onset is required, 0.375% ropivacaine is a better choice than 0.25% levobupivacaine.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03679897).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram presenting enrollment, intervention allocation, follow-up and data analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curve of proportion of patients who achieved (A) a complete sensory block and (B) a complete motor block after infraclavicular brachial plexus block. (A) log-rank test, p = 0.032; (B) log-rank test, p = 0.045.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chin, K. J., Alakkad, H., Adhikary, S. D. & Singh, M. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block for regional anaesthesia of the lower arm. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.28, CD005487. 10.1002/14651858.CD005487.pub3 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mariano ER, et al. A randomized comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2011;36:26–31. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318203069b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner D, Iohom G, Mahon P, Shorten G. Efficacy of axillary versus infraclavicular brachial plexus block in preventing tourniquet pain: a randomised trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:48–54. doi: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ootaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2000;25:600–604. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.18184. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:247–268. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources