Predictive remapping leaves a behaviorally measurable attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps
- PMID: 33634356
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01893-1
Predictive remapping leaves a behaviorally measurable attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps
Abstract
How does the brain maintain spatial attention despite the retinal displacement of objects by saccades? A possible solution is to use the vector of an upcoming saccade to compensate for the shift of objects on eye-centered (retinotopic) brain maps. In support of this hypothesis, previous studies have revealed attentional effects at the future retinal locus of an attended object, just before the onset of saccades. A critical yet unresolved theoretical issue is whether predictively remapped attentional effects would persist long enough on eye-centered brain maps, so no external input (goal, expectation, reward, memory, etc.) is needed to maintain spatial attention immediately following saccades. The present study examined this issue with inhibition of return (IOR), an attentional effect that reveals itself in both world-centered and eye-centered coordinates, and predictively remaps before saccades. In the first task, a saccade was introduced to a cueing task ("nonreturn-saccade task") to show that IOR is coded in world-centered coordinates following saccades. In a second cueing task, two consecutive saccades were executed to trigger remapping and to dissociate the retinal locus relevant to remapping from the cued retinal locus ("return-saccade" task). IOR was observed at the remapped retinal locus 430-ms following the (first) saccade that triggered remapping. A third cueing task ("no-remapping" task) further revealed that the lingering IOR effect left by remapping was not confounded by the attention spillover. These results together show that predictive remapping leaves a robust attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps. This retinotopic trace is sufficient to sustain spatial attention for a few hundred milliseconds following saccades.
Keywords: Eye movements; Inhibition of return; Predictive remapping; Spatial attention; Visual stability.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Predictive remapping gives rise to environmental inhibition of return.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1860-1866. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1066-x. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 27225636
-
Robustness of the retinotopic attentional trace after eye movements.J Vis. 2010 Mar 31;10(3):19.1-12. doi: 10.1167/10.3.19. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20377296 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for the predictive remapping of visual attention.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jan;200(1):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2055-3. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 19882149 Free PMC article.
-
The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Apr;28(2):181-200. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.003. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004. PMID: 15172763 Review.
-
Visual Remapping.Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 15;7:257-277. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-032321-100012. Epub 2021 Jul 9. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021. PMID: 34242055 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.776 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arkesteijn, K., Belopolsky, A. V., Smeets, J. B. J., & Donk, M. (2019). The limits of predictive remapping of attention across eye movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01146
-
- Awh, E., Armstrong, K. M., & Moore, T. (2006). Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bennett, P., & Pratt, J. (2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00313 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources