Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review
- PMID: 33634393
- PMCID: PMC7907402
- DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00297-z
Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: The main objective of this systematic review was to present the outcomes of the treatment with zygomatic implants (ZIs) in the rehabilitations of atrophic upper jaw.
Findings: An electronic database search in PubMed, along with a manual search, taking into account language and study period, was performed by two observers; any type of clinical trial and series that included the use of ZIs was used. In the search strategy, the following search terms were used: zygom* AND dental (Implant OR implants) AND edentulous NOT (biomechanic* OR finite element) NOT cadaver. The search was limited to English language, full text, and humans. Literature reviews and clinical case reports were not considered. Forty-two articles published between March 2003 and April 2019 were included in this analysis. The cases of 1247 patients were recovered; these patients received 2919 ZIs. Fifty-two ZIs were removed during the follow-up time. The survival rate of these implants was 98.22%, with a minimum follow-up of 1 month and a maximum of 228 months. Different surgical techniques were used to place ZIs; however, the intrasinusal technique was the most used (23 studies). Post-surgical sinusitis was the most common complication reported in the studies (39 cases).
Conclusions: Based on this review, ZIs were commonly used for rehabilitation of patients with atrophic upper jaw. The survival rates presented were high, and the surgical technique is dependent on the professional experience and the local anatomy. However, it needed additional clinical evidence on bone resorption, esthetic outcomes, and physiological characteristics.
Keywords: Full arch rehabilitation; Implant; Prosthetic rehabilitation; Surgery; Zygomatic implant.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors work in the company that manufactures the implants and components (Neodent) but affirm that they have no direct or indirect financial interest in the products or information listed in the article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation for the atrophic edentulous maxilla: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2024 May 31;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02561-w. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38822368 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jul 5;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x. Int J Implant Dent. 2023. PMID: 37405545 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of the Role of Implant Design in the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31 Suppl:s43-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.16suppl.g2. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. PMID: 27228254
-
Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06387-3. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40604849 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
Cited by
-
Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Data Regarding Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation with a Long-Term Follow-Up.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412963. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34948572 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of prostheses retained zygomatic and dental implants in large defects in the maxilla due to tumors or major trauma by biomechanical 3- dimensional finite element analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 19;25(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05468-7. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 39828680 Free PMC article.
-
Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review.Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;10(8):151. doi: 10.3390/dj10080151. Dent J (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36005249 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Zygoma Bone Shell Technique: A Proof-of-Concept Surgical Protocol in Human Cadaver for Bone Reconstruction After Zygomatic Implant Failure.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70093. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70093. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40088480 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery for Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1229-S1232. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1640_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025. PMID: 40655835 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Hatano N, Arevalo X, Muela R, Fortes V. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8:114–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Agliardi EL, Romeo D, Panigatti S, de Araújo NM, Maló P. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:1592–1599. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.023. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous