Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adrià Jorba-García et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery (dCAIS) systems when used to place dental implants and to compare its accuracy with static computer-aided implant surgery (sCAIS) systems and freehand implant placement.

Materials and methods: An electronic search was made to identify all relevant studies reporting on the accuracy of dCAIS systems for dental implant placement. The following PICO question was developed: "In patients or artificial models, is dental implant placement accuracy higher when dCAIS systems are used in comparison with sCAIS systems or with freehand placement? The main outcome variable was angular deviation between the central axes of the planned and final position of the implant. The data were extracted in descriptive tables, and a meta-analysis of single means was performed in order to estimate the deviations for each variable using a random-effects model.

Results: Out of 904 potential articles, the 24 selected assessed 9 different dynamic navigation systems. The mean angular and entry 3D global deviations for clinical studies were 3.68° (95% CI: 3.61 to 3.74; I2 = 99.4%) and 1.03 mm (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.04; I2 = 82.4%), respectively. Lower deviation values were reported in in vitro studies (mean angular deviation of 2.01° (95% CI: 1.95 to 2.07; I2 = 99.1%) and mean entry 3D global deviation of 0.46 mm (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.48 ; I2 = 98.5%). No significant differences were found between the different dCAIS systems. These systems were significantly more accurate than sCAIS systems (mean difference (MD): -0.86°; 95% CI: -1.35 to -0.36) and freehand implant placement (MD: -4.33°; 95% CI: -5.40 to -3.25).

Conclusion: dCAIS systems allow highly accurate implant placement with a mean angular of less than 4°. However, a 2-mm safety margin should be applied, since deviations of more than 1 mm were observed. dCAIS systems increase the implant placement accuracy when compared with freehand implant placement and also seem to slightly decrease the angular deviation in comparison with sCAIS systems.

Clinical relevance: The use of dCAIS could reduce the rate of complications since it allows a highly accurate implant placement.

Keywords: Computer-guided implantology; Dental implants; Dynamic computer-assisted surgery; Navigation systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Moraschini V, Poubel LADC, Ferreira VF, Barboza EDSP (2015) Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2014) Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 41:443–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12157 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Sculean A (2019) Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy. Periodontol 81:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12278 - DOI
    1. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Romanos G, Tarnow D (2008) Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. J Periodontol 79:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690339 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hämmerle CHF, Tarnow D (2018) The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review. J Periodontol 89:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0810 - DOI

Substances