Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0246658.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246658. eCollection 2021.

Exploring the relation between modelled and perceived workload of nurses and related job demands, job resources and personal resources; a longitudinal study

Affiliations

Exploring the relation between modelled and perceived workload of nurses and related job demands, job resources and personal resources; a longitudinal study

Wilhelmina F J M van den Oetelaar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aim: Calculating a modelled workload based on objective measures. Exploring the relation between this modelled workload and workload as perceived by nurses, including the effects of specific job demands, job resources and personal resources on the relation.

Design: Academic hospital in the Netherlands. Six surgical wards, capacity 15-30 beds. Data collected over 15 consecutive day shifts.

Methods: Modelled workload is calculated as a ratio of required care time, based on patient characteristics, baseline care time and time for non-patient related activities, and allocated care time, based on the amount of available nurses. Both required and allocated care time are corrected for nurse proficiency. Five dimensions of perceived workload were determined by questionnaires. Both the modelled and the perceived workloads were measured on a daily basis. Linear mixed effects models study the longitudinal relation between this modelled and workload as perceived by nurses and the effects of personal resources, job resources and job demands. ANOVA and post-hoc tests were used to identify differences in modelled workload between wards.

Results: Modelled workload varies roughly between 70 and 170%. Significant differences in modelled workload between wards were found but confidence intervals were wide. Modelled workload is positively associated with all five perceived workload measures (work pace, amount of work, mental load, emotional load, physical load). In addition to modelled workload, the job resource support of colleagues and job demands time spent on direct patient care and time spent on registration had the biggest significant effects on perceived workload.

Conclusions: The modelled workload does not exactly predict perceived workload, however there is a correlation between the two. The modelled workload can be used to detect differences in workload between wards, which may be useful in distributing workload more evenly in order prevent issues of over- and understaffing and organizational justice. Extra effort to promote team work is likely to have a positive effect on perceived workload. Nurse management can stimulate team cohesion, especially when workload is high. Registered nurses perceive a higher workload than other nurses. When the proportion of direct patient care in a workday is higher, the perceived workload is also higher. Further research is recommended. The findings of this research can help nursing management in allocating resources and directing their attention to the most relevant factors for balancing workload.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Studying the relation between modelled and perceived workload (our hypotheses).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Average modelled workload per ward per day, calculated retrospectively for the work sampling period.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Five line graphs with average perceived workloads per ward per day for amount of work, work pace, mental load, emotional load and physical load.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cuckler GA, Sisko AM, Poisal JA, Keehan SP, Smith SD, Madison AJ, et al..: National Health Expenditure Projections, 2017–26: Despite Uncertainty, Fundamentals Primarily Drive Spending Growth. In: Health Affairs. vol. 37, 1 March 2018. edn; 2018. 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1655 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martín Martín JJ, Puerto López del Amo González M, Dolores Cano García M: Review of the literature on the determinants of healthcare expenditure. Journal of applied economics 2011, 43(1):19–46.
    1. Dall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP: An Aging Population And Growing Disease Burden Will Require ALarge And Specialized Health Care Workforce By 2025. Health affairs 2013, 32(11). - PubMed
    1. Zhang X, Tai D, Pforsich H, Lin VW : United States Registered Nurse Workforce Report Card and Shortage Forecast: A Revisit. American Journal of Medical Quality 2017, 33(3):229–236. 10.1177/1062860617738328 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WorldHealthOrganization: Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. In. Edited by Europe WHORof: World Health Organization; 2014.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources