Public understanding of COVID-19 antibody testing and test results: A qualitative study conducted in the U.K. early in the pandemic
- PMID: 33636445
- PMCID: PMC7884253
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113778
Public understanding of COVID-19 antibody testing and test results: A qualitative study conducted in the U.K. early in the pandemic
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antibody testing was proposed by several countries as a surveillance tool to monitor the spread of the virus and potentially to ease restrictions. In the UK, antibody testing originally formed the third pillar of the UK Government's COVID-19 testing programme and was thought to offer hope that those with a positive antibody test result could return to normal life. However, at that time scientists and the public had little understanding of the longevity of COVID-19 antibodies, and whether they provided immunity to reinfection or transmission of the virus.
Objective: This paper explores the UK public's understanding of COVID-19 testing, perceived test accuracy, the meaning of a positive test result, willingness to adhere to restrictive measures in response to an antibody test result and how they expect other people to respond.
Methods: On-line synchronous focus groups were conducted in April/May 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic and the most stringent period of the COVID-19 restrictive measures. Data were analysed thematically.
Results: There was confusion in responses as to whether those with a positive or negative test should return to work and which restrictive measures would apply to them or their household members. Participants raised concerns about the wider public response to positive antibody test results and the adverse behavioural effects. There were worries that antibody tests could create a divided society particularly if those with a positive test result were given greater freedoms or chose to disregard the restrictive measures.
Conclusion: Should these tests be offered more widely, information should be developed in consultation with the public to ensure clarity and address uncertainty about test results and subsequent behaviours.
Keywords: Antibody testing; COVID-19; Pandemics; Public health; Public views; Qualitative research methods; UK.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[SARS-CoV-2 and Microbiological Diagnostic Dynamics in COVID-19 Pandemic].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jul;54(3):497-509. doi: 10.5578/mb.69839. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020. PMID: 32755524 Review. Turkish.
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33419461 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a national probability survey using home specimen collection methods to assess prevalence and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and antibody response.Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;49:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 11. Ann Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32791199 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-Vaccine Positivity of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Alberta, Canada during the First Two Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0029121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00291-21. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34406813 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Application of Serologic Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Contemporary Cardiovascular Practice.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb;10(5):e019506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019506. Epub 2021 Feb 23. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 33619984 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: a qualitative study of university students and staff.BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e053850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053850. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34475190 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to COVID-19 Testing: A Rapid Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;11(9):1685. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091685. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34574026 Free PMC article.
-
The hidden burden of medical testing: public views and experiences of COVID-19 testing as a social and ethical process.BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):1837. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14217-2. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36180839 Free PMC article.
-
The experiences of patients ill with COVID-19-like symptoms and the role of testing for SARS-CoV-2 in supporting them: A qualitative study in eight European countries during the first wave of the pandemic.Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(2):2212904. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2212904. Epub 2023 May 30. Eur J Gen Pract. 2023. PMID: 37248990 Free PMC article.
-
The next viral pandemic-where do we stand?Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2025 Jun;70(3):505-516. doi: 10.1007/s12223-025-01256-6. Epub 2025 Mar 28. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2025. PMID: 40153131 Review.
References
-
- Archibald M.M., Ambagtsheer R.C., Casey M.G., Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2019;18
-
- Armstrong S. Why covid-19 antibody tests are not the game changer the UK government claims. BMJ. 2020;369:m2469. - PubMed
-
- Baraniuk C. COVID-19 antibody tests: a briefing. BMJ. 2020;369 https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2284 - PubMed
-
- BBC . 2020. ‘Coronavirus: Antibody Test 'ready for Production by June'. 3 May, 2020. BBC News.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-52510194 [online] Available at:
-
- Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous