Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar:273:113778.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113778. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Public understanding of COVID-19 antibody testing and test results: A qualitative study conducted in the U.K. early in the pandemic

Jan Lecouturier  1 , Michael P Kelly  2 , Fiona Graham  3 , Carly Meyer  4 , Mei Yee Tang  5 , Louis Goffe  6 , Chris Bonell  7 , Susan Michie  8 , Falko F Sniehotta  9
Affiliations

Public understanding of COVID-19 antibody testing and test results: A qualitative study conducted in the U.K. early in the pandemic

Jan Lecouturier et al. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antibody testing was proposed by several countries as a surveillance tool to monitor the spread of the virus and potentially to ease restrictions. In the UK, antibody testing originally formed the third pillar of the UK Government's COVID-19 testing programme and was thought to offer hope that those with a positive antibody test result could return to normal life. However, at that time scientists and the public had little understanding of the longevity of COVID-19 antibodies, and whether they provided immunity to reinfection or transmission of the virus.

Objective: This paper explores the UK public's understanding of COVID-19 testing, perceived test accuracy, the meaning of a positive test result, willingness to adhere to restrictive measures in response to an antibody test result and how they expect other people to respond.

Methods: On-line synchronous focus groups were conducted in April/May 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic and the most stringent period of the COVID-19 restrictive measures. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: There was confusion in responses as to whether those with a positive or negative test should return to work and which restrictive measures would apply to them or their household members. Participants raised concerns about the wider public response to positive antibody test results and the adverse behavioural effects. There were worries that antibody tests could create a divided society particularly if those with a positive test result were given greater freedoms or chose to disregard the restrictive measures.

Conclusion: Should these tests be offered more widely, information should be developed in consultation with the public to ensure clarity and address uncertainty about test results and subsequent behaviours.

Keywords: Antibody testing; COVID-19; Pandemics; Public health; Public views; Qualitative research methods; UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Archibald M.M., Ambagtsheer R.C., Casey M.G., Lawless M. Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2019;18
    1. Armstrong S. Why covid-19 antibody tests are not the game changer the UK government claims. BMJ. 2020;369:m2469. - PubMed
    1. Baraniuk C. COVID-19 antibody tests: a briefing. BMJ. 2020;369 https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2284 - PubMed
    1. BBC . 2020. ‘Coronavirus: Antibody Test 'ready for Production by June'. 3 May, 2020. BBC News.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-52510194 [online] Available at:
    1. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

Substances